[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YqqYAtfn7PQeCxgW@Asurada-Nvidia>
Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2022 19:40:02 -0700
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
CC: <joro@...tes.org>, <will@...nel.org>, <marcan@...can.st>,
<sven@...npeter.dev>, <robin.murphy@....com>,
<robdclark@...il.com>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<orsonzhai@...il.com>, <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
<zhang.lyra@...il.com>, <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
<alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <jgg@...dia.com>,
<kevin.tian@...el.com>, <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
<alyssa@...enzweig.io>, <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
<yong.wu@...iatek.com>, <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
<gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>, <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
<vdumpa@...dia.com>, <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <cohuck@...hat.com>,
<thunder.leizhen@...wei.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
<christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>, <john.garry@...wei.com>,
<chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>, <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
<isaacm@...eaurora.org>, <yangyingliang@...wei.com>,
<jordan@...micpenguin.net>, <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
<virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] iommu: Return -EMEDIUMTYPE for incompatible
domain and device/group
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:09:49AM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On 2022/6/16 08:03, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > index 44016594831d..0dd13330fe12 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
> > @@ -4323,7 +4323,7 @@ static int prepare_domain_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > return -ENODEV;
> >
> > if (dmar_domain->force_snooping && !ecap_sc_support(iommu->ecap))
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > + return -EMEDIUMTYPE;
> >
> > /* check if this iommu agaw is sufficient for max mapped address */
> > addr_width = agaw_to_width(iommu->agaw);
> > @@ -4331,10 +4331,10 @@ static int prepare_domain_attach_device(struct iommu_domain *domain,
> > addr_width = cap_mgaw(iommu->cap);
> >
> > if (dmar_domain->max_addr > (1LL << addr_width)) {
> > - dev_err(dev, "%s: iommu width (%d) is not "
> > + dev_dbg(dev, "%s: iommu width (%d) is not "
> > "sufficient for the mapped address (%llx)\n",
> > __func__, addr_width, dmar_domain->max_addr);
> > - return -EFAULT;
> > + return -EMEDIUMTYPE;
> > }
> > dmar_domain->gaw = addr_width;
>
> Can we simply remove the dev_err()? As the return value has explicitly
> explained the failure reason, putting a print statement won't help much.
Yes. As long as no one has objection, I can remove that in the next
version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists