[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fe1c23cf-dab4-d926-ffef-7a8a5489a071@microchip.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 06:26:17 +0000
From: <Conor.Dooley@...rochip.com>
To: <windhl@....com>, <palmer@...belt.com>, <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
<aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
CC: <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<lkp@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] soc: sifive: (sifive_l2_cache) Add missing
of_node_put()
On 16/06/2022 06:54, Liang He wrote:
> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>
> At 2022-06-16 12:49:15, "Liang He" <windhl@....com> wrote:
>> In sifive_l2_init(), of_find_matching_node() will return a node pointer
>> with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() in each fail path
>> or when it is not used anymore.
>>
>> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@....com>
>> ---
>
>
> Sorry, please ignore this version as it still has a bug. I will have a strict check and compile the code before my next commit.
While you're at it - drop the Reported-by too.
You only need to include that if LKP found a problem with
a patch that's been applied already. If it's on something
in progress, just fix what it pointed out & resend.
Thanks,
Conor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists