linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 6/6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate the enable and mask operations

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220616064028.57933-7-samuel@sholland.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 01:40:28 -0500
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>
Cc:     Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
        Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 6/6] irqchip/sifive-plic: Separate the enable and mask operations

The PLIC has two per-IRQ checks before sending an IRQ to a hart context.
First, it checks that the IRQ's priority is nonzero. Then, it checks
that the enable bit is set for that combination of IRQ and context.

Currently, the PLIC driver sets both the priority value and the enable
bit in its (un)mask operations. However, modifying the enable bit is
problematic for two reasons:
  1) The enable bits are packed, so changes are not atomic and require
     taking a spinlock.
  2) The following requirement from the PLIC spec, which explains the
     racy (un)mask operations in plic_irq_eoi():

       If the completion ID does not match an interrupt source
       that is currently enabled for the target, the completion
       is silently ignored.

Both of these problems are solved by using the priority value to mask
IRQs. Each IRQ has a separate priority register, so writing the priority
value is atomic. And since the enable bit remains set while an IRQ is
masked, the EOI operation works normally. The enable bits are still used
to control the IRQ's affinity.

Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
---

(no changes since v1)

 drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
index bf7d5bee0c0c..53d266a571be 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sifive-plic.c
@@ -103,9 +103,7 @@ static inline void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask,
 				   struct irq_data *d, int enable)
 {
 	int cpu;
-	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
 
-	writel(enable, priv->regs + PRIORITY_BASE + d->hwirq * PRIORITY_PER_ID);
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, mask) {
 		struct plic_handler *handler = per_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers, cpu);
 
@@ -113,16 +111,37 @@ static inline void plic_irq_toggle(const struct cpumask *mask,
 	}
 }
 
-static void plic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+static void plic_irq_enable(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d), d, 1);
 }
 
-static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+static void plic_irq_disable(struct irq_data *d)
 {
 	plic_irq_toggle(irq_data_get_effective_affinity_mask(d), d, 0);
 }
 
+static void plic_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	writel(1, priv->regs + PRIORITY_BASE + d->hwirq * PRIORITY_PER_ID);
+}
+
+static void plic_irq_mask(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct plic_priv *priv = irq_data_get_irq_chip_data(d);
+
+	writel(0, priv->regs + PRIORITY_BASE + d->hwirq * PRIORITY_PER_ID);
+}
+
+static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
+{
+	struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
+
+	writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
+}
+
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 			     const struct cpumask *mask_val, bool force)
@@ -141,32 +160,21 @@ static int plic_set_affinity(struct irq_data *d,
 	if (cpu >= nr_cpu_ids)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	plic_irq_mask(d);
+	plic_irq_disable(d);
 
 	irq_data_update_effective_affinity(d, cpumask_of(cpu));
 
-	if (!irqd_irq_masked(d))
-		plic_irq_unmask(d);
+	if (!irqd_irq_disabled(d))
+		plic_irq_enable(d);
 
 	return IRQ_SET_MASK_OK_DONE;
 }
 #endif
 
-static void plic_irq_eoi(struct irq_data *d)
-{
-	struct plic_handler *handler = this_cpu_ptr(&plic_handlers);
-
-	if (irqd_irq_masked(d)) {
-		plic_irq_unmask(d);
-		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
-		plic_irq_mask(d);
-	} else {
-		writel(d->hwirq, handler->hart_base + CONTEXT_CLAIM);
-	}
-}
-
 static struct irq_chip plic_chip = {
 	.name		= "SiFive PLIC",
+	.irq_enable	= plic_irq_enable,
+	.irq_disable	= plic_irq_disable,
 	.irq_mask	= plic_irq_mask,
 	.irq_unmask	= plic_irq_unmask,
 	.irq_eoi	= plic_irq_eoi,
@@ -372,8 +380,11 @@ static int __init plic_init(struct device_node *node,
 			i * CONTEXT_ENABLE_SIZE;
 		handler->priv = priv;
 done:
-		for (hwirq = 1; hwirq <= nr_irqs; hwirq++)
+		for (hwirq = 1; hwirq <= nr_irqs; hwirq++) {
 			plic_toggle(handler, hwirq, 0);
+			writel(1, priv->regs + PRIORITY_BASE +
+				  hwirq * PRIORITY_PER_ID);
+		}
 		nr_handlers++;
 	}
 
-- 
2.35.1