[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b48b3de0-d521-a9ad-f9f9-1312f8486ba7@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 10:51:55 +0200
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: Rex-BC Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>,
"mturquette@...libre.com" <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: "sboyd@...nel.org" <sboyd@...nel.org>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"wenst@...omium.org" <wenst@...omium.org>,
Miles Chen (陳民樺)
<Miles.Chen@...iatek.com>,
"chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com" <chun-jie.chen@...iatek.com>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
jitao.shi@...iatek.com, mandyjh.liu@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: mediatek: clk-mt8195-vdo0: Set rate on
vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf's parent
Il 16/06/22 09:12, Rex-BC Chen ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2022-06-14 at 17:10 +0800, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
>> Add the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT flag to the CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF
>> clock: this is required to trigger clock source selection on
>> CLK_TOP_EDP, while avoiding to manage the enablement of the former
>> separately from the latter in the displayport driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
>> angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c | 7 ++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
>> b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
>> index 261a7f76dd3c..07b46bfd5040 100644
>> --- a/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
>> +++ b/drivers/clk/mediatek/clk-mt8195-vdo0.c
>> @@ -37,6 +37,10 @@ static const struct mtk_gate_regs vdo0_2_cg_regs =
>> {
>> #define GATE_VDO0_2(_id, _name, _parent, _shift)
>> \
>> GATE_MTK(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo0_2_cg_regs, _shift,
>> &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr)
>>
>> +#define GATE_VDO0_2_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, _shift, _flags)
>> \
>> + GATE_MTK_FLAGS(_id, _name, _parent, &vdo0_2_cg_regs, _shift,
>> \
>> + &mtk_clk_gate_ops_setclr, _flags)
>> +
>> static const struct mtk_gate vdo0_clks[] = {
>> /* VDO0_0 */
>> GATE_VDO0_0(CLK_VDO0_DISP_OVL0, "vdo0_disp_ovl0", "top_vpp",
>> 0),
>> @@ -85,7 +89,8 @@ static const struct mtk_gate vdo0_clks[] = {
>> /* VDO0_2 */
>> GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DSI0_DSI, "vdo0_dsi0_dsi", "top_dsi_occ",
>> 0),
>> GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DSI1_DSI, "vdo0_dsi1_dsi", "top_dsi_occ",
>> 8),
>> - GATE_VDO0_2(CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF, "vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf",
>> "top_edp", 16),
>> + GATE_VDO0_2_FLAGS(CLK_VDO0_DP_INTF0_DP_INTF,
>> "vdo0_dp_intf0_dp_intf",
>> + "top_edp", 16, CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT),
>> };
>>
>> static int clk_mt8195_vdo0_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> --
>> 2.35.1
>>
>
> Hello Angelo,
>
> Thanks for this patch.
> Another dp clock should also be fix.
> After confirming with Jitao who is our dp expert.
> The parent of CLK_VDO1_DPINTF should be top_dp instead of top_vpp.
>
> Thanks!
Hey.
Yes, we should really fix that, I can send a separated series with:
* A first commit fixing the clock parent (with a Fixes: tag)
* A second commit adding the CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT
...and I'll do that ASAP.
Thank you!
Angelo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists