lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <75124ab23f2c845d8f683d7e3123de3ccdb07ad0.camel@mniewoehner.de>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:04:30 +0200
From:   Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>
To:     Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, LinoSanfilippo@....de,
        James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com
Cc:     peterhuewe@....de, jgg@...pe.ca, stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
        linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        l.sanfilippo@...bus.com, lukas@...ner.de, p.rosenberger@...bus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 10/10] tpm, tpm_tis: Enable interrupt test

On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 21:26 +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 01:08:46PM +0200, LinoSanfilippo@....de wrote:
> > From: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
> > 
> > The test for interrupts in tpm_tis_send() is skipped if the flag
> > TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ is not set. Since the current code never sets the flag
> > initially the test is never executed.
> > 
> > Fix this by setting the flag in tpm_tis_gen_interrupt() right after
> > interrupts have been enabled.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lino Sanfilippo <l.sanfilippo@...bus.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c | 5 +++++
> >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > index e5edf745fb23..be229c173f10 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_core.c
> > @@ -774,11 +774,16 @@ static int tpm_tis_gen_interrupt(struct tpm_chip
> > *chip)
> >         if (ret < 0)
> >                 return ret;
> >  
> > +       chip->flags |= TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> > +
> >         if (chip->flags & TPM_CHIP_FLAG_TPM2)
> >                 ret = tpm2_get_tpm_pt(chip, 0x100, &cap2, desc);
> >         else
> >                 ret = tpm1_getcap(chip, TPM_CAP_PROP_TIS_TIMEOUT, &cap,
> > desc, 0);
> >  
> > +       if (ret)
> > +               chip->flags &= ~TPM_CHIP_FLAG_IRQ;
> > +
> >         release_locality(chip, 0);
> >  
> >         return ret;
> > -- 
> > 2.36.1
> > 
> 
> James, do you have a chance to test this on your side? Thanks.
> 
> BR, Jarkko

Tested-by: Michael Niewöhner <linux@...ewoehner.de>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ