linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAP6Zq1jdMN_vB1Uoi6rb_E1DydS7+-A0sWMRNUhDPF4pzkr2kA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 16:41:25 +0300
From:   Tomer Maimon <tmaimon77@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
Cc:     Avi Fishman <avifishman70@...il.com>,
        Tali Perry <tali.perry1@...il.com>,
        Joel Stanley <joel@....id.au>,
        Patrick Venture <venture@...gle.com>,
        Nancy Yuen <yuenn@...gle.com>,
        Benjamin Fair <benjaminfair@...gle.com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Wim Van Sebroeck <wim@...ux-watchdog.org>,
        Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
        Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
        Marcel Ziswiler <marcel.ziswiler@...adex.com>,
        Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
        Biju Das <biju.das.jz@...renesas.com>,
        Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@...hiba.co.jp>,
        Robert Hancock <robert.hancock@...ian.com>,
        Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>,
        Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
        devicetree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-clk <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:SERIAL DRIVERS" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        LINUXWATCHDOG <linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 12/20] dt-bindings: reset: npcm: Add support for NPCM8XX

Hi Krzysztof,

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 at 16:39, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
>
> On 16/06/2022 06:24, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> > Hi Krzysztof,
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 at 20:03, Krzysztof Kozlowski
> > <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/06/2022 02:25, Tomer Maimon wrote:
> >>> Hi Krzysztof,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for your clarification.
> >>>
> >>> We can remove the dt-binding file and use numbers in the DTS,
> >>> appreciate if you can answer few additional questions:
> >>> 1. Do you suggest adding all NPCM reset values to the NPCM reset
> >>> document or the reset values should describe in the module
> >>> documentation that uses it?
> >>
> >> What is "NPCM reset document"? Are these reset values anyhow different
> >> than interrupts or pins?
> > No, they represent the same values.
>
>
> We do not document in the bindings actual pin or interrupt numbers...
>
> >>
> >>> 2. Some of the NPCM7XX document modules describe the reset value they
> >>> use from the dt-binding for example:
> >>> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/adc/nuvoton%2Cnpcm750-adc.yaml#L61
> >>
> >> This is NPCM750
> >>
> >>> If we remove the NPCM8XX dt-binding file should we describe the
> >>> NPCM8XX values in the NPCM-ADC document file?
> >>
> >> What is NPCM-ADC document file? What do you want to describe there?
> >> Again - how is it different than interrupts?
> > It is not different from the interrupts.
> > I will remove the dt-binding reset include file, the reset property
> > will use numbers and not macro's.
>
> I have no clue what are you referring now... This is NPCM8xx and it has
> no binding header with reset values. What to remove then?
I refer nuvoton,npcm8xx-reset.h file, we don't need it.
>
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof