[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <F6C267B0-83EA-4151-A4EC-44482AC52C59@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:22:26 +0000
From: Chuck Lever III <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: possible trace_printk() bug in v5.19-rc1
Hi Steve-
Since v5.19-rc1, trace_printk() no longer displays a function
name, but rather a kernel address. I don't have time at the
moment to track this down to a specific commit, just parking
it here in case someone can get to it sooner than me.
<idle>-0 [003] 269.397568: bprint: 0xffffffffc0cccab7: nf=0xffff888172dbfba0 still on the LRU or a dispose list
<idle>-0 [003] 269.397576: bprint: 0xffffffffc0cccafa: nf=0xffff888172dbfba0
<idle>-0 [003] 269.397583: bprint: 0xffffffffc0cccab7: nf=0xffff8881726cd4d8 still on the LRU or a dispose list
<idle>-0 [003] 269.397584: bprint: 0xffffffffc0cccafa: nf=0xffff8881726cd4d8
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists