linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <33ca91aeb5254831a88e187ff8d9a2c2@AcuMS.aculab.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Jun 2022 15:58:52 +0000
From:   David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
To:     'Andrew Jones' <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
CC:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        "Catalin Marinas" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        "Peter Shier" <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>,
        Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>,
        Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>,
        Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
        Colton Lewis <coltonlewis@...gle.com>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] selftests: KVM: Handle compiler optimizations in ucall

From: Andrew Jones
> Sent: 16 June 2022 13:03
> 
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 06:57:06PM +0000, Raghavendra Rao Ananta wrote:
> > The selftests, when built with newer versions of clang, is found
> > to have over optimized guests' ucall() function, and eliminating
> > the stores for uc.cmd (perhaps due to no immediate readers). This
> > resulted in the userspace side always reading a value of '0', and
> > causing multiple test failures.
> >
> > As a result, prevent the compiler from optimizing the stores in
> > ucall() with WRITE_ONCE().
> >
> > Suggested-by: Ricardo Koller <ricarkol@...gle.com>
> > Suggested-by: Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Raghavendra Rao Ananta <rananta@...gle.com>
> > ---
> >  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c | 9 ++++-----
> >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
> b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
> > index e0b0164e9af8..be1d9728c4ce 100644
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/aarch64/ucall.c
> > @@ -73,20 +73,19 @@ void ucall_uninit(struct kvm_vm *vm)
> >
> >  void ucall(uint64_t cmd, int nargs, ...)
> >  {
> > -	struct ucall uc = {
> > -		.cmd = cmd,
> > -	};
> > +	struct ucall uc = {};
> >  	va_list va;
> >  	int i;
> >
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(uc.cmd, cmd);
> >  	nargs = nargs <= UCALL_MAX_ARGS ? nargs : UCALL_MAX_ARGS;
> >
> >  	va_start(va, nargs);
> >  	for (i = 0; i < nargs; ++i)
> > -		uc.args[i] = va_arg(va, uint64_t);
> > +		WRITE_ONCE(uc.args[i], va_arg(va, uint64_t));
> >  	va_end(va);
> >
> > -	*ucall_exit_mmio_addr = (vm_vaddr_t)&uc;
> > +	WRITE_ONCE(*ucall_exit_mmio_addr, (vm_vaddr_t)&uc);
> >  }

Am I misreading things again?
That function looks like it writes the address of an on-stack
item into global data.

Maybe 'uc' ought to be static?

	David

-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)