linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: vexpress-sysreg: Allow for no child nodes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:14:53 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dt-bindings: vexpress-sysreg: Allow for no child
 nodes

On Mon, 13 Jun 2022 11:18:08 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
> It is valid for arm,vexpress-sysreg to have no child nodes when either
> the deprecated binding without child nodes is used or a platform
> has no GPIOs. If there are no child nodes, then "#address-cells" and
> "#size-cells" should not be required. However, "reg" should be present
> in all cases, so let's add it now.
> 
> Cc: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/vexpress-sysreg.yaml | 3 +--
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 

Applied, thanks!