linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update DW 8250 UART maintainership

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7690845ccf9597e8cdc560a674a1b8e79a10f680.camel@perches.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:17:37 -0700
From:   Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:     kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>,
        Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-serial <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...ts.01.org, Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: Update DW 8250 UART maintainership

On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 04:09 +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi "Ilpo,
> 
> Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
> 
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.19-rc2 next-20220617]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
> 
> url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ilpo-J-rvinen/MAINTAINERS-Update-DW-8250-UART-maintainership/20220617-174145
> base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 47700948a4abb4a5ae13ef943ff682a7f327547a
> reproduce: make htmldocs
> 
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
> 
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
> 
> > > 'utf-8' codec can't decode byte 0xe4 in position 1396: invalid continuation byte

?

false positive?