linux-kernel - [PATCH v3] powerpc:85xx: Add missing of_node_put() in sgy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220617052214.4004188-1-windhl@126.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 13:22:14 +0800
From:   Liang He <windhl@....com>
To:     oss@...error.net, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
        paulus@...ba.org, christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr, windhl@....com,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] powerpc:85xx: Add missing of_node_put() in sgy_cst1000

In gpio_halt_probe(), of_find_matching_node() will return a node
pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() in
fail path or when it is not used anymore.

Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@....com>
---
 arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 39 +++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
index 98ae64075193..a8690fc552cf 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
@@ -71,33 +71,39 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 {
 	enum of_gpio_flags flags;
 	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
+	struct device_node *child_node;
 	int gpio, err, irq;
 	int trigger;
+	int ret;
 
 	if (!node)
 		return -ENODEV;
 
 	/* If there's no matching child, this isn't really an error */
-	halt_node = of_find_matching_node(node, child_match);
-	if (!halt_node)
+	child_node = of_find_matching_node(node, child_match);
+	if (!child_node)
 		return 0;
 
 	/* Technically we could just read the first one, but punish
 	 * DT writers for invalid form. */
-	if (of_gpio_count(halt_node) != 1)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	if (of_gpio_count(child_node) != 1) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		goto err_put;
+	}
 
 	/* Get the gpio number relative to the dynamic base. */
-	gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(halt_node, 0, &flags);
-	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
-		return -EINVAL;
+	gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(child_node, 0, &flags);
+	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
+		ret = -EINVAL;
+		gotot err_put;
+	}
 
 	err = gpio_request(gpio, "gpio-halt");
 	if (err) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting GPIO %d.\n",
 		       gpio);
-		halt_node = NULL;
-		return err;
+		ret = err;
+		goto err_put;
 	}
 
 	trigger = (flags == OF_GPIO_ACTIVE_LOW);
@@ -105,15 +111,15 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	gpio_direction_output(gpio, !trigger);
 
 	/* Now get the IRQ which tells us when the power button is hit */
-	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(halt_node, 0);
+	irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(child_node, 0);
 	err = request_irq(irq, gpio_halt_irq, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING |
-			  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, "gpio-halt", halt_node);
+			  IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING, "gpio-halt", child_node);
 	if (err) {
 		printk(KERN_ERR "gpio-halt: error requesting IRQ %d for "
 		       "GPIO %d.\n", irq, gpio);
 		gpio_free(gpio);
-		halt_node = NULL;
-		return err;
+		ret = err;
+		goto err_put;
 	}
 
 	/* Register our halt function */
@@ -122,8 +128,12 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 	printk(KERN_INFO "gpio-halt: registered GPIO %d (%d trigger, %d"
 	       " irq).\n", gpio, trigger, irq);
+	ret = 0;
+	halt_node = of_node_get(child_node);
 
-	return 0;
+err_put:
+	of_node_put(child_node);
+	return ret;
 }
 
 static int gpio_halt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
@@ -139,6 +149,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 
 		gpio_free(gpio);
 
+		of_node_put(halt_node);
 		halt_node = NULL;
 	}
 
-- 
2.25.1