lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220617055710.d4wnya5aclskpqjg@pengutronix.de>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 07:57:10 +0200
From:   Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To:     Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: efm32: remove bindings for deleted platform

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:07:19PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Commit cc6111375cec ("ARM: drop efm32 platform") removed the platform,
> so no need to still carry the bindings.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>
> ---
>  .../devicetree/bindings/clock/efm32-clock.txt | 11 -----
>  .../devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-efm32.txt     | 33 --------------
>  .../devicetree/bindings/serial/efm32-uart.txt | 20 ---------
>  .../devicetree/bindings/spi/efm32-spi.txt     | 39 -----------------
>  include/dt-bindings/clock/efm32-cmu.h         | 43 -------------------
>  5 files changed, 146 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/efm32-clock.txt
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/i2c/i2c-efm32.txt
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/efm32-uart.txt
>  delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/efm32-spi.txt
>  delete mode 100644 include/dt-bindings/clock/efm32-cmu.h

I didn't do that back then wondering if the bindings are sensible to
keep even for removed arch (or more general drivers). In this case the
chip isn't old and unavailable, but just too small for sensible Linux
usage.

OTOH I'm not aware of any dtb usage on efm32.

No hard feelings here, if you consider it not useful to keep the binding
around, go on and remove them.

Best regards
Uwe

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                           | Uwe Kleine-König            |
Industrial Linux Solutions                 | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ