[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220617064421.l4vshytmqtittzee@vireshk-i7>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 12:14:21 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patches@...ts.linux.dev, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qcom-hw: Don't do lmh things without a throttle
interrupt
On 17-06-22, 03:21, Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
> On 6/17/22 01:45, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Offlining cpu6 and cpu7 and then onlining cpu6 hangs on
> > sc7180-trogdor-lazor because the throttle interrupt doesn't exist.
> > Similarly, things go sideways when suspend/resume runs. That's because
> > the qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_online() and qcom_cpufreq_hw_lmh_exit()
> > functions are calling genirq APIs with an interrupt value of '-6', i.e.
> > -ENXIO, and that isn't good.
> >
> > Check the value of the throttle interrupt like we already do in other
> > functions in this file and bail out early from lmh code to fix the hang.
> >
> > Reported-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>
> > Cc: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
> > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Fixes: a1eb080a0447 ("cpufreq: qcom-hw: provide online/offline operations")
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c | 6 ++++++
> > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > index 0253731d6d25..36c79580fba2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/qcom-cpufreq-hw.c
> > @@ -442,6 +442,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_online(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > struct platform_device *pdev = cpufreq_get_driver_data();
> > int ret;
> > + if (data->throttle_irq <= 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > ret = irq_set_affinity_hint(data->throttle_irq, policy->cpus);
> > if (ret)
> > dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to set CPU affinity of %s[%d]\n",
> > @@ -469,6 +472,9 @@ static int qcom_cpufreq_hw_cpu_offline(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
> > static void qcom_cpufreq_hw_lmh_exit(struct qcom_cpufreq_data *data)
> > {
> > + if (data->throttle_irq <= 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > free_irq(data->throttle_irq, data);
> > }
> >
> Reviewed-by: Vladimir Zapolskiy <vladimir.zapolskiy@...aro.org>
Applied. Thanks.
--
viresh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists