linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc:85xx: Add missing of_node_put() in sgy

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 06:53:13 +0000
From:   Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
To:     Liang He <windhl@....com>
CC:     "oss@...error.net" <oss@...error.net>,
        "mpe@...erman.id.au" <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
        "paulus@...ba.org" <paulus@...ba.org>,
        "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] powerpc:85xx: Add missing of_node_put() in sgy_cst1000



Le 17/06/2022 à 08:45, Liang He a écrit :
> 
> 
> 
> At 2022-06-17 14:28:56, "Christophe Leroy" <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu> wrote:
>>
>>
>> Le 17/06/2022 à 08:08, Liang He a écrit :
>>> In gpio_halt_probe(), of_find_matching_node() will return a node
>>> pointer with refcount incremented. We should use of_node_put() in
>>> fail path or when it is not used anymore.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Liang He <windhl@....com>
>>> ---
>>>    changelog:
>>>    v4: reuse exist 'err' and use a simple code style, advised by CJ
>>>    v3: use local 'child_node' advised by Michael.
>>>    v2: use goto-label patch style advised by Christophe Leroy.
>>>    v1: add of_node_put() before each exit.
>>>
>>>    arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c | 35 ++++++++++++++---------
>>>    1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>>> index 98ae64075193..e4588943fe7e 100644
>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/85xx/sgy_cts1000.c
>>> @@ -71,6 +71,7 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    {
>>>    	enum of_gpio_flags flags;
>>>    	struct device_node *node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>> +	struct device_node *child_node;
>>>    	int gpio, err, irq;
>>>    	int trigger;
>>>    
>>> @@ -78,26 +79,29 @@ static int gpio_halt_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>    		return -ENODEV;
>>>    
>>>    	/* If there's no matching child, this isn't really an error */
>>> -	halt_node = of_find_matching_node(node, child_match);
>>> -	if (!halt_node)
>>> +	child_node = of_find_matching_node(node, child_match);
>>> +	if (!child_node)
>>>    		return 0;
>>>    
>>>    	/* Technically we could just read the first one, but punish
>>>    	 * DT writers for invalid form. */
>>> -	if (of_gpio_count(halt_node) != 1)
>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	if (of_gpio_count(child_node) != 1) {
>>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>>> +		goto err_put;
>>> +	}
>>>    
>>>    	/* Get the gpio number relative to the dynamic base. */
>>> -	gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(halt_node, 0, &flags);
>>> -	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio))
>>> -		return -EINVAL;
>>> +	gpio = of_get_gpio_flags(child_node, 0, &flags);
>>> +	if (!gpio_is_valid(gpio)) {
>>> +		err = -EINVAL;
>>> +		gotot err_put;
>>
>> Did you test the build ?
> 
> Sorry for this fault.
> 
> In fact, I am still finding an efficient way to building different arch source code as I only have x86-64.
> 
> Now I am try using QEMU.
> 
> Anyway, sorry for this fault.

You can find cross compilers for most architectures for x86-64 here : 
https://mirrors.edge.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/

Christophe