[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220617073840.GA45710@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 15:38:40 +0800
From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.garry@...wei.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@....com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
German Gomez <german.gomez@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] perf test: Add ARM SPE system wide test
Hi Namhyung,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:05:46PM -0700, Namhyung Kim wrote:
[...]
> +arm_spe_system_wide_test() {
> + echo "Recording trace with system-wide mode $perfdata"
> + perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -a \
> + -- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=100000 > /dev/null 2>&1
> +
> + if [ $? != 0 ]; then
> + arm_spe_report "SPE system-wide testing" 2
> + return
> + fi
I am awared the root permission issue after I saw German's suggestion.
If the snapshot test is passed, no matter the system wide test is passed
or not, we will always return 0 for 'passed' result. But we might miss
to capture the system-wide testing failure.
How about use 'dummy' event to verіfy the root permission?
(actually I referred to intel-pt test):
perf record -o ${tmpfile} -B -N --no-bpf-event -e dummy:u -a true 2>&1 >/dev/null
if [ $? != 0 ]; then
arm_spe_report "SPE system-wide testing" 2
return
fi
perf record -o ${perfdata} -e arm_spe// -a \
-- dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/null count=100000 > /dev/null 2>&1
Thanks,
Leo
> + perf_script_samples dd &&
> + perf_report_samples dd
> +
> + err=$?
> + arm_spe_report "SPE system-wide testing" $err
> +}
> +
> arm_spe_snapshot_test
> +arm_spe_system_wide_test
> +
> exit $glb_err
> --
> 2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists