[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8354ba5b-d1ce-90c7-be76-328ab9321550@suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2022 09:57:06 +0200
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzju@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 7/7] mm/page_alloc: Replace local_lock with normal
spinlock
On 6/16/22 23:07, Yu Zhao wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 11:02 AM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>>
>>
>> > @@ -3794,19 +3805,29 @@ static struct page *rmqueue_pcplist(struct zone *preferred_zone,
>> > struct list_head *list;
>> > struct page *page;
>> > unsigned long flags;
>> > + unsigned long __maybe_unused UP_flags;
>> >
>> > - local_lock_irqsave(&pagesets.lock, flags);
>> > + /*
>> > + * spin_trylock_irqsave is not necessary right now as it'll only be
>> > + * true when contending with a remote drain. It's in place as a
>> > + * preparation step before converting pcp locking to spin_trylock
>> > + * to protect against IRQ reentry.
>> > + */
>> > + pcp_trylock_prepare(UP_flags);
>> > + pcp = pcp_spin_trylock_irqsave(zone->per_cpu_pageset, flags);
>> > + if (!pcp)
>>
>> Besides the missing unpin Andrew fixed, I think also this is missing
>> pcp_trylock_finish(UP_flags); ?
>
> spin_trylock only fails when trylock_finish is a NOP.
True, so it's not an active bug, but I would still add it, so it's not
confusing and depending on non-obvious details that might later change and
break the code.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists