linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Prevent kmemleak from accessing pKVM memory

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Yqw5JRrUJO73mtIy@kernel.org>
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 11:19:49 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
To:     Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
Cc:     Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
        Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Prevent kmemleak from accessing pKVM memory

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:11:34PM +0000, Quentin Perret wrote:
> Commit a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method
> private") changed the API using which memory is reserved for the pKVM
> hypervisor. However, it seems that memblock_phys_alloc() differs
> from the original API in terms of kmemleak semantics -- the old one
> excluded the reserved regions from kmemleak scans when the new one
> doesn't seem to. Unfortunately, when protected KVM is enabled, all

I'd rather say that memblock_find_in_range() didn't inform kmemleak about
the reserved regions, while memblock_phys_alloc() does.

> kernel accesses to pKVM-private memory result in a fatal exception,
> which can now happen because of kmemleak scans:
> 
> $ echo scan > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> [   34.991354] kvm [304]: nVHE hyp BUG at: [<ffff800008fa3750>] __kvm_nvhe_handle_host_mem_abort+0x270/0x290!
> [   34.991580] kvm [304]: Hyp Offset: 0xfffe8be807e00000
> [   34.991813] Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic:
> [   34.991813] PS:600003c9 PC:0000f418011a3750 ESR:00000000f2000800
> [   34.991813] FAR:ffff000439200000 HPFAR:0000000004792000 PAR:0000000000000000
> [   34.991813] VCPU:0000000000000000
> [   34.993660] CPU: 0 PID: 304 Comm: bash Not tainted 5.19.0-rc2 #102
> [   34.994059] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
> [   34.994452] Call trace:
> [   34.994641]  dump_backtrace.part.0+0xcc/0xe0
> [   34.994932]  show_stack+0x18/0x6c
> [   34.995094]  dump_stack_lvl+0x68/0x84
> [   34.995276]  dump_stack+0x18/0x34
> [   34.995484]  panic+0x16c/0x354
> [   34.995673]  __hyp_pgtable_total_pages+0x0/0x60
> [   34.995933]  scan_block+0x74/0x12c
> [   34.996129]  scan_gray_list+0xd8/0x19c
> [   34.996332]  kmemleak_scan+0x2c8/0x580
> [   34.996535]  kmemleak_write+0x340/0x4a0
> [   34.996744]  full_proxy_write+0x60/0xbc
> [   34.996967]  vfs_write+0xc4/0x2b0
> [   34.997136]  ksys_write+0x68/0xf4
> [   34.997311]  __arm64_sys_write+0x20/0x2c
> [   34.997532]  invoke_syscall+0x48/0x114
> [   34.997779]  el0_svc_common.constprop.0+0x44/0xec
> [   34.998029]  do_el0_svc+0x2c/0xc0
> [   34.998205]  el0_svc+0x2c/0x84
> [   34.998421]  el0t_64_sync_handler+0xf4/0x100
> [   34.998653]  el0t_64_sync+0x18c/0x190
> [   34.999252] SMP: stopping secondary CPUs
> [   35.000034] Kernel Offset: disabled
> [   35.000261] CPU features: 0x800,00007831,00001086
> [   35.000642] Memory Limit: none
> [   35.001329] ---[ end Kernel panic - not syncing: HYP panic:
> [   35.001329] PS:600003c9 PC:0000f418011a3750 ESR:00000000f2000800
> [   35.001329] FAR:ffff000439200000 HPFAR:0000000004792000 PAR:0000000000000000
> [   35.001329] VCPU:0000000000000000 ]---
> 
> Fix this by explicitly excluding the hypervisor's memory pool from
> kmemleak like we already do for the hyp BSS.
> 
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>
> Fixes: a7259df76702 ("memblock: make memblock_find_in_range method private")
> Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
> ---
> An alternative could be to actually exclude memory allocated using
> memblock_phys_alloc_range() from kmemleak scans to revert back to the
> old behaviour.

This would be wrong because memblock_phys_alloc() does allocate memory and
unless there is a good reason to exclude it from kmemleak.

> But nobody else has complained about this AFAIK, so I'd be inclined to
> keep this local to pKVM. No strong opinion.

Yes, please :)
An alternative to excluding this memory from kmemleak is to allocate it
using 

	memblock_phys_alloc_range(size, align, 0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_NOLEAKTRACE)

then it won't be added to kmemleak at the first place.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 400bb0fe2745..28765bd22efb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -2110,11 +2110,11 @@ static int finalize_hyp_mode(void)
>  		return 0;
>  
>  	/*
> -	 * Exclude HYP BSS from kmemleak so that it doesn't get peeked
> -	 * at, which would end badly once the section is inaccessible.
> -	 * None of other sections should ever be introspected.
> +	 * Exclude HYP sections from kmemleak so that they don't get peeked
> +	 * at, which would end badly once inaccessible.
>  	 */
>  	kmemleak_free_part(__hyp_bss_start, __hyp_bss_end - __hyp_bss_start);
> +	kmemleak_free_part(__va(hyp_mem_base), hyp_mem_size);
>  	return pkvm_drop_host_privileges();
>  }
>  
> -- 
> 2.36.1.476.g0c4daa206d-goog
> 

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.