lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Jun 2022 20:54:56 +0200
From:   Frank Wunderlich <frank-w@...lic-files.de>
To:     Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
        Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
Subject: Aw: Re: helping with remapping vmem for dma

> Gesendet: Freitag, 17. Juni 2022 um 19:22 Uhr
> Von: "Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@....com>
> An: "Frank Wunderlich" <frank-w@...lic-files.de>, "Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
> Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, "Marek Szyprowski" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>
> Betreff: Re: helping with remapping vmem for dma
>
> On 2022-06-17 17:17, Frank Wunderlich wrote:
> > Am 15. Juni 2022 15:17:00 MESZ schrieb Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>:
> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 02:15:33PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> >>> Put simply, if you want to call dma_map_single() on a buffer, then that
> >>> buffer needs to be allocated with kmalloc() (or technically alloc_pages(),
> >>> but then dma_map_page() would make more sense when dealing with entire
> >>> pages.
> >>
> >> Yes.  It sounds like the memory here comes from the dma coherent
> >> allocator, in which case the code need to use the address returned
> >> by that and not create another mapping.
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > traced it to buffer allocated as simple uint8-array [1]:
> >
> > UINT_8 aucBuffer[sizeof(INIT_HIF_RX_HEADER_T) + sizeof(INIT_EVENT_CMD_RESULT)];
>
> Ah, so it's trying to do DMA with a stack variable? CONFIG_DMA_API_DEBUG
> is your friend; it should have screamed about that specifically.
> Allocate this buffer properly to begin with, and free it again on the
> way out of the function (it's surely not worth having to make a
> temporary copy further down the callchain). The kmalloc flags can
> probably be regular GFP_KERNEL, unless this can be called from more
> restrictive contexts like an IRQ handler - the fact that it might be
> mapped for DMA later is essentially irrelevant in that respect.

Hi,

simply replaced the stack-vars to uint_8-pointers and using kmalloc/kfree for
memory handling (needed to replace some returns to goto to always free memory).

Thanks very much for support, driver is now working again :)

https://github.com/frank-w/BPI-R2-4.14/commit/7f3a721d5b0d8ca44935c23d5513a19cc57786c0

> Thanks,
> Robin.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ