[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220618002220.panwk4zwnigayboy@box.shutemov.name>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2022 03:22:20 +0300
From: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To: Yuntao Wang <ytcoode@...il.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mm: Fix possible index overflow when creating page
table mapping
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 09:55:10PM +0800, Yuntao Wang wrote:
> There are two issues in phys_p4d_init():
>
> - The __kernel_physical_mapping_init() does not do boundary-checking for
> paddr_end and passes it directly to phys_p4d_init(), phys_p4d_init() does
> not do bounds checking either, so if the physical memory to be mapped is
> large enough, 'p4d_page + p4d_index(vaddr)' will wrap around to the
> beginning entry of the P4D table and its data will be overwritten.
>
> - The for loop body will be executed only when 'vaddr < vaddr_end'
> evaluates to true, but if that condition is true, 'paddr >= paddr_end'
> will evaluate to false, thus the 'if (paddr >= paddr_end) {}' block will
> never be executed and become dead code.
>
> To fix these issues, use 'i < PTRS_PER_P4D' instead of 'vaddr < vaddr_end'
> as the for loop condition, this also make it more consistent with the logic
> of the phys_{pud,pmt,pte}_init() functions.
Hm. I don't see why you changed phys_p4d_init(), but not
__kernel_physical_mapping_init(). It does exactly the same thing, just
pgd_index() is hidden a bit deeper than p4d_index().
--
Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists