linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20220618113703.GA10888@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jun 2022 13:37:03 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>,
        Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
        baijiaju1990@...il.com, oslab@...nghua.edu.cn,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, jonathanh@...dia.com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
        slade@...dewatkins.com, Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@...gle.com>,
        Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@...gle.com>,
        kunit-dev@...glegroups.com,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.17 000/772] 5.17.14-rc1 review

Hi!

> >>    Fixes: bc082a55d25c ("bcache: fix inaccurate io state for detached
> > ...
> > 
> >> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> >> @@ -1107,6 +1107,12 @@ static void detached_dev_do_request(struct
> >> bcache_device *d, struct bio *bio,
> >>         * which would call closure_get(&dc->disk.cl)
> >>         */
> >>        ddip = kzalloc(sizeof(struct detached_dev_io_private), GFP_NOIO);
> >> +       if (!ddip) {
> >> +               bio->bi_status = BLK_STS_RESOURCE;
> >> +               bio->bi_end_io(bio);
> >> +               return;
> >> +       }
> >> +
> >>        ddip->d = d;
> >>        /* Count on the bcache device */
> >>        ddip->orig_bdev = orig_bdev;
> >> 
> > 
> > So... for patch to make any difference, memory allocation has to fail
> > and ddip has to be NULL.
> > 
> > Before the patch, it would oops in "ddip->d = d;". With the patch, you
> > do some kind of error handling. Even if it is buggy, it should not do
> > more harm than immediate oops.
> 
> I just receive this single email and don’t have any idea for the context and what the problem is. Where can I see the whole conversation?
> 

Discussion happened on stable@...r.kernel.org mailing lists, archives
should be easily available. Copy went to lkml, too.

Best regards,
								Pavel
-- 
People of Russia, stop Putin before his war on Ukraine escalates.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)