linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal/drivers/tegra: Remove get

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <6d5b2bfc-f449-668c-8c97-638eb806cb66@gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 18 Jun 2022 15:44:07 +0300
From:   Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
To:     Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>, rafael@...nel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
        Amit Kucheria <amitk@...nel.org>,
        Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
        Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
        Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        "open list:TEGRA ARCHITECTURE SUPPORT" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] thermal/drivers/tegra: Remove get_trend function

16.06.2022 23:25, Daniel Lezcano пишет:
> The get_trend function does already what the generic framework does.
> 
> Remove it.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c | 32 --------------------------------
>  1 file changed, 32 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> index 210325f92559..825eab526619 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/tegra/soctherm.c
> @@ -633,37 +633,6 @@ static int tegra_thermctl_set_trip_temp(void *data, int trip, int temp)
>  	return 0;
>  }
>  
> -static int tegra_thermctl_get_trend(void *data, int trip,
> -				    enum thermal_trend *trend)
> -{
> -	struct tegra_thermctl_zone *zone = data;
> -	struct thermal_zone_device *tz = zone->tz;
> -	int trip_temp, temp, last_temp, ret;
> -
> -	if (!tz)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	ret = tz->ops->get_trip_temp(zone->tz, trip, &trip_temp);
> -	if (ret)
> -		return ret;
> -
> -	temp = READ_ONCE(tz->temperature);
> -	last_temp = READ_ONCE(tz->last_temperature);
> -
> -	if (temp > trip_temp) {
> -		if (temp >= last_temp)
> -			*trend = THERMAL_TREND_RAISING;
> -		else
> -			*trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE;
> -	} else if (temp < trip_temp) {
> -		*trend = THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING;
> -	} else {
> -		*trend = THERMAL_TREND_STABLE;
> -	}
> -
> -	return 0;
> -}
> -
>  static void thermal_irq_enable(struct tegra_thermctl_zone *zn)
>  {
>  	u32 r;
> @@ -716,7 +685,6 @@ static int tegra_thermctl_set_trips(void *data, int lo, int hi)
>  static const struct thermal_zone_of_device_ops tegra_of_thermal_ops = {
>  	.get_temp = tegra_thermctl_get_temp,
>  	.set_trip_temp = tegra_thermctl_set_trip_temp,
> -	.get_trend = tegra_thermctl_get_trend,
>  	.set_trips = tegra_thermctl_set_trips,
>  };
>  

The framework doesn't use the trip temperature, is it really the same?
Previously, if temperature was above the trip and was dropping, then it
was THERMAL_TREND_STABLE instead of THERMAL_TREND_DROPPING.