[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5627a654-d605-6840-a133-e583c804aadd@kernel.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 08:01:38 +0800
From: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To: qixiaoyu1 <qxy65535@...il.com>, jaegeuk@...nel.org
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, liuchao12 <liuchao12@...omi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] resize.f2fs: add option to manually specify new
overprovision
On 2022/6/14 19:49, qixiaoyu1 wrote:
> From: liuchao12 <liuchao12@...omi.com>
>
> Make.f2fs supports manually specifying overprovision, and we expect
> resize.f2fs to support it as well.
>
> This change add a new '-o' option to manually specify overprovision.
>
> Signed-off-by: liuchao12 <liuchao12@...omi.com>
> ---
> fsck/main.c | 8 ++++++--
> fsck/resize.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fsck/main.c b/fsck/main.c
> index aef797e..3b4da0f 100644
> --- a/fsck/main.c
> +++ b/fsck/main.c
> @@ -121,7 +121,8 @@ void resize_usage()
> MSG(0, "[options]:\n");
> MSG(0, " -d debug level [default:0]\n");
> MSG(0, " -i extended node bitmap, node ratio is 20%% by default\n");
> - MSG(0, " -s safe resize (Does not resize metadata)");
> + MSG(0, " -o overprovision percentage [default:auto]\n");
Should update manual as well?
> + MSG(0, " -s safe resize (Does not resize metadata)\n");
> MSG(0, " -t target sectors [default: device size]\n");
> MSG(0, " -V print the version number and exit\n");
> exit(1);
> @@ -527,7 +528,7 @@ void f2fs_parse_options(int argc, char *argv[])
> #endif
> } else if (!strcmp("resize.f2fs", prog)) {
> #ifdef WITH_RESIZE
> - const char *option_string = "d:fst:iV";
> + const char *option_string = "d:fst:io:V";
>
> c.func = RESIZE;
> while ((option = getopt(argc, argv, option_string)) != EOF) {
> @@ -561,6 +562,9 @@ void f2fs_parse_options(int argc, char *argv[])
> case 'i':
> c.large_nat_bitmap = 1;
> break;
> + case 'o':
> + c.new_overprovision = atof(optarg);
> + break;
> case 'V':
> show_version(prog);
> exit(0);
> diff --git a/fsck/resize.c b/fsck/resize.c
> index f1b7701..d19c6fa 100644
> --- a/fsck/resize.c
> +++ b/fsck/resize.c
> @@ -146,12 +146,15 @@ safe_resize:
> get_sb(segs_per_sec));
>
> /* Let's determine the best reserved and overprovisioned space */
> - c.new_overprovision = get_best_overprovision(sb);
> + if (c.new_overprovision == 0)
> + c.new_overprovision = get_best_overprovision(sb);
> +
> c.new_reserved_segments =
> (2 * (100 / c.new_overprovision + 1) + 6) *
> get_sb(segs_per_sec);
>
> - if ((get_sb(segment_count_main) - 2) < c.new_reserved_segments ||
> + if (c.new_overprovision == 0 ||
Should never be zero here? Otherwise above "100 / c.new_overprovision"
calculation will cause arithmetic exception.
Thanks,
> + (get_sb(segment_count_main) - 2) < c.new_reserved_segments ||
> get_sb(segment_count_main) * blks_per_seg >
> get_sb(block_count)) {
> MSG(0, "\tError: Device size is not sufficient for F2FS volume, "
> @@ -476,6 +479,11 @@ static void rebuild_checkpoint(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> set_cp(overprov_segment_count, get_cp(overprov_segment_count) +
> get_cp(rsvd_segment_count));
>
> + DBG(0, "Info: Overprovision ratio = %.3lf%%\n", c.new_overprovision);
> + DBG(0, "Info: Overprovision segments = %u (GC reserved = %u)\n",
> + get_cp(overprov_segment_count),
> + c.new_reserved_segments);
> +
> free_segment_count = get_free_segments(sbi);
> new_segment_count = get_newsb(segment_count_main) -
> get_sb(segment_count_main);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists