lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKb7UviXhWc4yxvGGCJQ=Pyvc9HUUbYDcnc3E6gVqrJePdEYCw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 19 Jun 2022 23:28:27 -0400
From:   Ilia Mirkin <imirkin@...m.mit.edu>
To:     linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Deadlock in rfcomm_sk_state_change

Hi all,

It appears that this deadlock has been reported a few times before:

BZ here: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=215746
Patch here: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211004180734.434511-1-desmondcheongzx@gmail.com/

A Google search turns up a few other instances too.

This is the deadlock I ran into, on a ThinkPad T420s with kernel
v5.18.5. I never ran into this with the kernel I previously had on
here, v5.7.8.

[ 1513.564806] task:krfcommd        state:D stack:14824 pid:  571
ppid:     2 flags:0x00004000
[ 1513.564833] Call Trace:
[ 1513.564838]  <TASK>
[ 1513.564843]  __schedule+0x27a/0x1050
[ 1513.564861]  schedule+0x46/0xb0
[ 1513.564867]  schedule_preempt_disabled+0xc/0x20
[ 1513.564875]  __mutex_lock.constprop.0+0x284/0x4b0
[ 1513.564884]  rfcomm_run+0x14d/0x1340
[ 1513.564895]  ? swake_up_all+0xe0/0xe0
[ 1513.564908]  ? rfcomm_check_accept+0xd0/0xd0
[ 1513.564919]  kthread+0xd4/0x100
[ 1513.564930]  ? kthread_complete_and_exit+0x20/0x20
[ 1513.564940]  ret_from_fork+0x22/0x30
[ 1513.564955]  </TASK>
[ 1513.564968] task:bluetoothd      state:D stack:13248 pid: 4917
ppid:     1 flags:0x00000004
[ 1513.564987] Call Trace:
[ 1513.564990]  <TASK>
[ 1513.564994]  __schedule+0x27a/0x1050
[ 1513.565004]  ? eventfd_read+0xda/0x280
[ 1513.565020]  schedule+0x46/0xb0
[ 1513.565028]  __lock_sock+0x74/0xc0
[ 1513.565042]  ? destroy_sched_domains_rcu+0x30/0x30
[ 1513.565055]  lock_sock_nested+0x3f/0x50
[ 1513.565065]  rfcomm_sk_state_change+0x20/0x100
[ 1513.565078]  __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x8d/0x1a0
[ 1513.565088]  rfcomm_dlc_close+0x66/0x90
[ 1513.565098]  __rfcomm_sock_close+0x30/0xf0
[ 1513.565109]  rfcomm_sock_shutdown+0x4a/0x80
[ 1513.565122]  rfcomm_sock_release+0x22/0x90
[ 1513.565133]  __sock_release+0x38/0xb0
[ 1513.565146]  sock_close+0xc/0x20
[ 1513.565157]  __fput+0x87/0x240
[ 1513.565172]  task_work_run+0x57/0x90
[ 1513.565190]  exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x108/0x110
[ 1513.565206]  syscall_exit_to_user_mode+0x1d/0x50
[ 1513.565224]  ? __x64_sys_close+0x8/0x40
[ 1513.565239]  do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[ 1513.565253]  ? __x64_sys_close+0x8/0x40
[ 1513.565271]  ? do_syscall_64+0x69/0xc0
[ 1513.565276]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
[ 1513.565283] RIP: 0033:0x7f818c753883
[ 1513.565287] RSP: 002b:00007ffd9222fe78 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX:
0000000000000003
[ 1513.565292] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 000056007127afd0 RCX: 00007f818c753883
[ 1513.565295] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000016
[ 1513.565297] RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
[ 1513.565299] R10: 0000000000000026 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000000
[ 1513.565302] R13: 0000000000000001 R14: 000056007125af84 R15: 000056007125af9c
[ 1513.565306]  </TASK>

However it doesn't look like the patch has been applied (at least in
Linus's current tree), nor does there appear to be any motion on the
BZ-filed issue. Happy to provide any additional information, just let
me know what you need.

Cheers,

Ilia Mirkin
imirkin@...m.mit.edu

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ