lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220620124739.458601247@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:49:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 047/240] random: avoid superfluous call to RDRAND in CRNG extraction

From: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>

commit 2ee25b6968b1b3c66ffa408de23d023c1bce81cf upstream.

RDRAND is not fast. RDRAND is actually quite slow. We've known this for
a while, which is why functions like get_random_u{32,64} were converted
to use batching of our ChaCha-based CRNG instead.

Yet CRNG extraction still includes a call to RDRAND, in the hot path of
every call to get_random_bytes(), /dev/urandom, and getrandom(2).

This call to RDRAND here seems quite superfluous. CRNG is already
extracting things based on a 256-bit key, based on good entropy, which
is then reseeded periodically, updated, backtrack-mutated, and so
forth. The CRNG extraction construction is something that we're already
relying on to be secure and solid. If it's not, that's a serious
problem, and it's unlikely that mixing in a measly 32 bits from RDRAND
is going to alleviate things.

And in the case where the CRNG doesn't have enough entropy yet, we're
already initializing the ChaCha key row with RDRAND in
crng_init_try_arch_early().

Removing the call to RDRAND improves performance on an i7-11850H by
370%. In other words, the vast majority of the work done by
extract_crng() prior to this commit was devoted to fetching 32 bits of
RDRAND.

Reviewed-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@...c4.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/char/random.c |    4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/char/random.c
+++ b/drivers/char/random.c
@@ -1024,7 +1024,7 @@ static void crng_reseed(struct crng_stat
 static void _extract_crng(struct crng_state *crng,
 			  __u8 out[CHACHA_BLOCK_SIZE])
 {
-	unsigned long v, flags, init_time;
+	unsigned long flags, init_time;
 
 	if (crng_ready()) {
 		init_time = READ_ONCE(crng->init_time);
@@ -1034,8 +1034,6 @@ static void _extract_crng(struct crng_st
 				    &input_pool : NULL);
 	}
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&crng->lock, flags);
-	if (arch_get_random_long(&v))
-		crng->state[14] ^= v;
 	chacha20_block(&crng->state[0], out);
 	if (crng->state[12] == 0)
 		crng->state[13]++;


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ