[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220620124745.707271865@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:52:14 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>,
Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 233/240] virtio-pci: Remove wrong address verification in vp_del_vqs()
From: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>
commit 7e415282b41bf0d15c6e0fe268f822d9b083f2f7 upstream.
GCC 12 enhanced -Waddress when comparing array address to null [0],
which warns:
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c: In function ‘vp_del_vqs’:
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c:257:29: warning: the comparison will always evaluate as ‘true’ for the pointer operand in ‘vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks + (sizetype)((long unsigned int)i * 256)’ must not be NULL [-Waddress]
257 | if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i])
| ^~~~~~
In fact, the verification is comparing the result of a pointer
arithmetic, the address "msix_affinity_masks + i", which will always
evaluate to true.
Under the hood, free_cpumask_var() calls kfree(), which is safe to pass
NULL, not requiring non-null verification. So remove the verification
to make compiler happy (happy compiler, happy life).
[0] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102103
Signed-off-by: Murilo Opsfelder Araujo <muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>
Message-Id: <20220415023002.49805-1-muriloo@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Christophe de Dinechin <dinechin@...hat.com>
Cc: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
+++ b/drivers/virtio/virtio_pci_common.c
@@ -254,8 +254,7 @@ void vp_del_vqs(struct virtio_device *vd
if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks) {
for (i = 0; i < vp_dev->msix_vectors; i++)
- if (vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i])
- free_cpumask_var(vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i]);
+ free_cpumask_var(vp_dev->msix_affinity_masks[i]);
}
if (vp_dev->msix_enabled) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists