linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 12/18] EDAC/amd64: Add determine_edac

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YrCed0NnrVUjKoJh@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 18:21:11 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Yazen Ghannam <yazen.ghannam@....com>
Cc:     linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Smita.KoralahalliChannabasappa@....com, muralidhara.mk@....com,
        naveenkrishna.chatradhi@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/18] EDAC/amd64: Add determine_edac_cap() into pvt->ops

Back to those...

On Mon, May 09, 2022 at 02:55:28PM +0000, Yazen Ghannam wrote:
> From: Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@....com>
> 
> GPU Nodes will have different criteria for checking the EDAC
> capabilities of a controller. A function pointer should be used rather
> than introduce another branching condition.
> 
> Prepare for this by adding determine_edac_cap() to pvt->ops and set it
> as needed based on currently supported systems.
> 
> Use a "umc" prefix for modern systems, since these use Unified Memory
> Controllers (UMCs).
> 
> Use a "dct" prefix for newly-defined legacy functions, since these
> systems use DRAM Controllers (DCTs).

Please refrain from adding those boilerplates to each commit message. Do
it once for the first patch and then no need anymore. It is clear what's
going on.

Thx.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette