linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: cleanups and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8095f934-34c3-17d9-9e4b-6f244f205dac@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:34:17 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@...nel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] dt-bindings: remoteproc: qcom: cleanups and
 improvements

On 17/05/2022 09:01, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Patches are mostly independent, so they can go via:
> 1. Qualcomm SoC (dt-bindings/soc: + arm64)
> 2. remoteproc (dt-bindings).
> 
> Changes since v1
> ================
> 1. Add review tags
> 2. Patch 8: Remove ref from label (Rob)
> 

Hey folks!

It has been a month since this patchset was sent.

The bindings part have Rob's ack. Maybe the remote-proc should go via DT
tree? Even if that happens, still the DTS wait for the same amount of
time... so not sure what to do here. Shall I pick it up as well?

Best regards,
Krzysztof