linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: qcom: correct kerneldoc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <c92b0b51-0e59-72ab-5306-ccec92b0cb94@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:35:49 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] remoteproc: qcom: correct kerneldoc

On 19/05/2022 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> Correct kerneldoc warnings like:
> 
>   drivers/remoteproc/qcom_common.c:68:
>     warning: expecting prototype for struct minidump_subsystem_toc. Prototype was for struct minidump_subsystem instead
> 
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
> 

Although these warnings are not that important, they are still warnings
we want to fix to be able to compile with W=1.

Is there anyone willing to pick it up? Any other comments?


Best regards,
Krzysztof