lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4972a70-8ddf-a394-3e8f-08fb778622d8@linaro.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 20:37:47 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] rpmsg: qcom: glink: replace strncpy() with
 strscpy_pad()

On 09/06/2022 10:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/05/2022 09:33, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> The use of strncpy() is considered deprecated for NUL-terminated
>> strings[1]. Replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad(), to keep existing
>> pad-behavior of strncpy, similarly to commit 08de420a8014 ("rpmsg:
>> glink: Replace strncpy() with strscpy_pad()").  This fixes W=1 warning:
>>
>>   In function ‘qcom_glink_rx_close’,
>>     inlined from ‘qcom_glink_work’ at ../drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c:1638:4:
>>   drivers/rpmsg/qcom_glink_native.c:1549:17: warning: ‘strncpy’ specified bound 32 equals destination size [-Wstringop-truncation]
>>    1549 |                 strncpy(chinfo.name, channel->name, sizeof(chinfo.name));
>>
>> [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/deprecated.html#strncpy-on-nul-terminated-strings
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> Changes since v1:
>> 1. Split series per subsystem.
> 
> Any comments on these?

I sent first iteration in May, then on 19th of May. There is review from
Stephen.

On 9th of June I pinged but the patchset is still waiting. Anyone minds
me taking these?

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ