lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YrDIimW0gW1j03WG@zn.tnic>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 21:20:42 +0200
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     medadyoung@...il.com
Cc:     rric@...nel.org, james.morse@....com, tony.luck@...el.com,
        mchehab@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org, benjaminfair@...gle.com,
        yuenn@...gle.com, venture@...gle.com, KWLIU@...oton.com,
        YSCHU@...oton.com, JJLIU0@...oton.com, KFTING@...oton.com,
        avifishman70@...il.com, tmaimon77@...il.com, tali.perry1@...il.com,
        ctcchien@...oton.com, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/3] EDAC: nuvoton: Add NPCM memory controller driver

On Fri, Jun 10, 2022 at 04:43:40PM +0800, medadyoung@...il.com wrote:
> From: Medad CChien <ctcchien@...oton.com>
> 
> Add memory controller support for Nuvoton NPCM SoC.
> 
> Note:
>     you can force an ecc event by writing a string to edac sysfs node
>     and remember to define CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG to enable this feature
>     example: force a correctable event on checkcode bit 0
>     echo "CE checkcode 0" to below path
>     /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/forced_ecc_error

That is silly and wrong: first of all, this all belongs into debugfs.

Then, you need three files:

|->error_type
|->location
|->bit

and there you write all those things. For an example, see

arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mce/inject.c

> Datasheet:
>     Cadence DDR Controller Register Reference Manual For DDR4 Memories
>     Chapter 2: Detailed Register Map

If that datasheet is not public, no need to mention it here. At least a
quick web search cannot find something relevant.

> Signed-off-by: Medad CChien <ctcchien@...oton.com>
> ---
>  MAINTAINERS              |   2 +-
>  drivers/edac/Kconfig     |  17 +
>  drivers/edac/Makefile    |   1 +
>  drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c | 680 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 699 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
> 
> diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
> index 7f832e6ed4e5..8919fb83f485 100644
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -2372,9 +2372,9 @@ F:	arch/arm/boot/dts/nuvoton-npcm*
>  F:	arch/arm/mach-npcm/
>  F:	drivers/*/*npcm*
>  F:	drivers/*/*/*npcm*
> +F:	drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c

Same file twice?!

>  F:	include/dt-bindings/clock/nuvoton,npcm7xx-clock.h
>  
> -
>  ARM/NUVOTON WPCM450 ARCHITECTURE
>  M:	Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@....net>
>  L:	openbmc@...ts.ozlabs.org (moderated for non-subscribers)
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Kconfig b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> index 58ab63642e72..aab7ba6c0d15 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/edac/Kconfig
> @@ -539,4 +539,21 @@ config EDAC_DMC520
>  	  Support for error detection and correction on the
>  	  SoCs with ARM DMC-520 DRAM controller.
>  
> +config EDAC_NPCM
> +	tristate "Nuvoton NPCM DDR Memory Controller"
> +	depends on (ARCH_NPCM || COMPILE_TEST)
> +	help
> +	  Support for error detection and correction on the Nuvoton NPCM DDR
> +	  memory controller.
> +
> +	  The Nuvoton BMC SoC supports DDR4 memory with and without ECC (error
> +	  correction check).
> +
> +	  The memory controller supports single bit error correction, double bit
> +	  error detection (in-line ECC in which a section (1/8th) of the memory
> +	  device used to store data is used for ECC storage).
> +
> +	  First, ECC must be configured in the BootBlock header. Then, this driver
> +	  will expose error counters via the EDAC kernel framework.
> +
>  endif # EDAC
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/Makefile b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> index 2d1641a27a28..db3c59d3ad84 100644
> --- a/drivers/edac/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/edac/Makefile
> @@ -84,3 +84,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_QCOM)			+= qcom_edac.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_ASPEED)		+= aspeed_edac.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_BLUEFIELD)		+= bluefield_edac.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_DMC520)		+= dmc520_edac.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_EDAC_NPCM)			+= npcm_edac.o
> diff --git a/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..3eb522c75646
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/edac/npcm_edac.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,680 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +// Copyright (c) 2022 Nuvoton Technology Corporation
> +
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> +
> +#include "edac_module.h"
> +
> +#define NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME "npcm-edac"
> +#define FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT		BIT(1)
> +#define EDAC_MSG_SIZE						256
> +/* Granularity of reported error in bytes */
> +#define NPCM_EDAC_ERR_GRAIN				1
> +
> +#define MEM_TYPE_DDR4						0xA
> +
> +#define NPCM7XX_CHIP						0x700
> +#define NPCM8XX_CHIP						0x800
> +
> +/* Control register width definitions */
> +#define WDTH_16								(2)
> +#define WDTH_32								(1)
> +#define WDTH_64								(0)
> +#define CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK			GENMASK(4, 0)
> +#define CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT					(32)
> +#define XOR_CHECK_BIT_SPLIT_WIDTH			(16)
> +#define CTL_CONTROLLER_BUSY_FLAG			BIT(0)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_FORCE_WC				BIT(8)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_AUTO_WRITEBACK_EN	BIT(24)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_XOR_BITS_MASK			GENMASK(23, 16)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_MTYPE_MASK			GENMASK(11, 8)
> +#define NPCM_ECC_CTL_GLOBAL_INT_DISABLE		BIT(31)
> +
> +/* Syndrome values */
> +#define ECC_DOUBLE_MULTI_ERR_SYND			0x03

Align all those definitions vertically pls.

> +
> +static char data_synd[] = {
> +	0xf4, 0xf1, 0xec, 0xea, 0xe9, 0xe6, 0xe5, 0xe3,
> +	0xdc, 0xda, 0xd9, 0xd6, 0xd5, 0xd3, 0xce, 0xcb,
> +	0xb5, 0xb0, 0xad, 0xab, 0xa8, 0xa7, 0xa4, 0xa2,
> +	0x9d, 0x9b, 0x98, 0x97, 0x94, 0x92, 0x8f, 0x8a,
> +	0x75, 0x70, 0x6d, 0x6b, 0x68, 0x67, 0x64, 0x62,
> +	0x5e, 0x5b, 0x58, 0x57, 0x54, 0x52, 0x4f, 0x4a,
> +	0x34, 0x31, 0x2c, 0x2a, 0x29, 0x26, 0x25, 0x23,
> +	0x1c, 0x1a, 0x19, 0x16, 0x15, 0x13, 0x0e, 0x0b
> +};
> +
> +static char check_synd[] = { 0x01, 0x02, 0x04, 0x08, 0x10, 0x20, 0x40, 0x80 };

That looks unneeded - it is basically the bit number so you can
do:

	1 << bit_no

simply and AFAICT.

> +struct npcm_edac_platform_data {
> +	/* force ECC event */
> +	u32 ip_features;
> +	u32 ddr_ctl_controller_busy_reg;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_xor_check_bits_reg;
> +
> +	u32 chip;
> +
> +	/* DDR4 Controller Registers */
> +	u32 ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg;
> +	u32 ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg;
> +
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_en_reg;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_int_status;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_int_ack;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask_master;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc;
> +
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_l;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_h;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_data_l;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_data_h;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_id;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_synd;
> +
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_l;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_h;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_data_l;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_data_h;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_id;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_synd;
> +
> +	/* MASK */
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask;
> +
> +	/* ECC IRQ Macros */
> +	u32 ecc_int_ce_event;
> +	u32 ecc_int_second_ce_event;
> +	u32 ecc_int_ue_event;
> +	u32 ecc_int_second_ue_event;
> +	u32 ecc_int_ce_ue_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_ce_intr_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_ue_intr_mask;
> +
> +	/* ECC Signature Macros */
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_id_shift;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_synd_shift;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_id_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_c_synd_mask;
> +
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_id_shift;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_synd_shift;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_id_mask;
> +	u32 ecc_sig_u_synd_mask;

Most of those struct members start with "ecc_" - you can basically
remove that prefix.

> +};
> +
> +struct priv_data {
> +	void __iomem *reg;
> +	u32 ce_cnt;
> +	u32 ue_cnt;
> +	char message[EDAC_MSG_SIZE];
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip;
> +};
> +
> +
> +static void init_mem_layout(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> +{
> +	struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> +	struct csrow_info *csi;
> +	struct dimm_info *dimm;
> +	struct sysinfo info;
> +	enum mem_type mtype;
> +	u32 val, width;
> +	u32 size, row;
> +	int j;
> +
> +	dimm = edac_get_dimm(mci, 0, 0, 0);
> +

^ Superfluous newline.

> +	if (dimm)
> +		return;

Also, what is that test supposed to do?

> +	si_meminfo(&info);
> +	size = info.totalram * info.mem_unit;
> +	for (row = 0; row < mci->nr_csrows; row++) {
> +		csi = mci->csrows[row];
> +
> +		for (j = 0; j < csi->nr_channels; j++) {
> +			dimm            = csi->channels[j]->dimm;
> +			dimm->edac_mode = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;

That vertical alignment on the '=' is just silly, especially if you have
only two assignments and the third one isn't aligned.

> +			/* Get memory type by reading hw registers */
> +			val = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg);

Do I see it correctly that you're reading the same register over and
over again? Why?

> +			mtype = val & NPCM_ECC_CTL_MTYPE_MASK;
> +			if (mtype == MEM_TYPE_DDR4)
> +				dimm->mtype = MEM_DDR4;
> +			else
> +				dimm->mtype = MEM_EMPTY;
> +
> +			/* Get EDAC devtype width for the current mc */
> +			width = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg)
> +				      & CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK;

Same here. Push them all outside of the loop.

Also, this one could be split to be made more readable:

			width  = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg);
			width &= CTL_MEM_MAX_WIDTH_MASK;

and *here* vertical alignment actually makes sense.

> +			switch (width) {
> +			case WDTH_16:
> +				dimm->dtype = DEV_X2;
> +				break;
> +			case WDTH_32:
> +				dimm->dtype = DEV_X4;
> +				break;
> +			case WDTH_64:
> +				dimm->dtype = DEV_X8;
> +				break;
> +			default:
> +				dimm->dtype = DEV_UNKNOWN;
> +			}
> +
> +			dimm->nr_pages = (size >> PAGE_SHIFT) /
> +				csi->nr_channels;

No need to break that line.

> +			dimm->grain = NPCM_EDAC_ERR_GRAIN;
> +		}
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +


^ Superfluous newline.

> +static void handle_correctable_error(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)

handle_ce()

> +{
> +	struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> +	u64 err_c_addr = 0x0;
> +	u64 err_c_data = 0x0;
> +	u32 err_c_synd, err_c_id;
> +	u32 sig_val_l, sig_val_h = 0x0;

Why the init to 0 and overwriting them later? Looks useless.

Also,

The EDAC tree preferred ordering of variable declarations at the
beginning of a function is reverse fir tree order::

	struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
	unsigned long foo, bar;
	unsigned int tmp;
	int ret;

The above is faster to parse than the reverse ordering::

	int ret;
	unsigned int tmp;
	unsigned long foo, bar;
	struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;

And even more so than random ordering::

	unsigned long foo, bar;
	int ret;
	struct long_struct_name *descriptive_name;
	unsigned int tmp;


Please fix the rest of the functions too.

> +	sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_l);
> +
> +	if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> +		sig_val_h = (readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_h) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask);
> +
> +	err_c_addr = (((err_c_addr | sig_val_h) <<
> +				CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> +	sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_data_l);
> +
> +	if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> +		sig_val_h = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_data_h);
> +
> +	err_c_data = (((err_c_data | sig_val_h) <<
> +				CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> +	err_c_id = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id_mask) >>
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_id_shift);
> +
> +	err_c_synd = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd_mask) >>
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_c_synd_shift);

Why are all those right-hand statements in brackets? Do you need to
brush up on C and operator precedence?

Ditto for the rest of this thing.

> +	priv->ce_cnt += 1;
> +
> +	snprintf(priv->message,
> +		 EDAC_MSG_SIZE, "DDR ECC %s: data=0x%llx source_id=%#08x",
> +		 mci->ctl_name, err_c_data, err_c_id);
> +
> +	edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_CORRECTED, mci,
> +			     priv->ce_cnt,
> +			     err_c_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +			     err_c_addr & ~PAGE_MASK,
> +			     err_c_synd, 0, 0, -1,
> +			     priv->message, "");
> +}
> +
> +static void handle_ue(struct mem_ctl_info *mci)
> +{
> +	struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> +	u64 err_u_addr = 0x0;
> +	u64 err_u_data = 0x0;
> +	u32 err_u_synd, err_u_id;
> +	u32 sig_val_l, sig_val_h = 0x0;
> +
> +	sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_l);
> +
> +	if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> +		sig_val_h = (readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_h) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask);
> +
> +	err_u_addr = (((err_u_addr | sig_val_h) <<
> +				CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> +	sig_val_l = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_data_l);
> +
> +	if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP)
> +		sig_val_h = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_data_h);
> +
> +	err_u_data = (((err_u_data | sig_val_h) <<
> +				CTL_REG_WIDTH_SHIFT) | sig_val_l);
> +
> +	err_u_id = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id_mask) >>
> +			npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_id_shift);
> +
> +	err_u_synd = ((readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd) &
> +				npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd_mask) >>
> +			npcm_chip->ecc_sig_u_synd_shift);
> +	priv->ue_cnt += 1;
> +
> +	snprintf(priv->message, EDAC_MSG_SIZE,
> +		 "DDR ECC %s: addr=0x%llx data=0x%llx source_id=%#08x",
> +		 mci->ctl_name, err_u_addr, err_u_data, err_u_id);
> +
> +	edac_mc_handle_error(HW_EVENT_ERR_UNCORRECTED, mci,
> +			     priv->ue_cnt,
> +			     err_u_addr >> PAGE_SHIFT,
> +			     err_u_addr & ~PAGE_MASK,
> +			     err_u_synd, 0, 0, -1,
> +			     priv->message, "");
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t edac_ecc_isr(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct mem_ctl_info *mci = dev_id;
> +	struct priv_data *priv = mci->pvt_info;
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip = priv->npcm_chip;
> +	u32 intr_status;
> +	u32 val;
> +
> +	/* Check the intr status and confirm ECC error intr */
> +	intr_status = readl(priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_status);
> +
> +	edac_dbg(3, "dev: %s, id: %s: IRQ: %d, interrupt status: 0x%x\n",
> +		 mci->dev_name, mci->ctl_name, irq, intr_status);
> +
> +	val = intr_status & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_ue_mask;
> +	if (!((val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) || (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask)))
> +		return IRQ_NONE;

You don't need this check if you do:

	if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) {

		...

	} else if if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask) {

		...

	} else {
		return IRQ_NONE;
	}

Also, I'm wondering why this interrupt would be raised if intr_status
won't hold either CE or UE bits set at all?!

> +
> +	if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ce_intr_mask) {
> +		handle_correctable_error(mci);
> +
> +		/* Clear the interrupt source */
> +		if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_event)
> +			writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_ce_event, priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> +		else if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ce_event)
> +			writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ce_event,
> +			       priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> +		else
> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to clear CE IRQ\n");

This looks wrong - you haven't failed to clear the IRQ source - this
looks more like it has to do with the CE and UE bits not being set in
intr_status.

So what is that printk actually there for?

> +	}
> +
> +	if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_ue_intr_mask) {
> +		handle_ue(mci);
> +
> +		/* Clear the interrupt source */
> +		if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_ue_event)
> +			writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_ue_event, priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> +		else if (val & npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ue_event)
> +			writel(npcm_chip->ecc_int_second_ue_event,
> +			       priv->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_ack);
> +		else
> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to clear UE IRQ\n");

Ditto.

> +	}
> +
> +	edac_dbg(3, "Total error count CE %d UE %d\n",
> +		 priv->ce_cnt, priv->ue_cnt);
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static ssize_t forced_ecc_error_show(struct device *dev,
> +				     struct device_attribute *mattr,
> +				     char *data)
> +{
> +	return sprintf(data, "CDNS-DDR4 Force Injection Help:\n"
> +		       "Example:\n"
> +		       "echo \"CE checkcode 0\" > /sys/devices/system/edac/mc/mc0/forced_ecc_error\n"
> +		       "CE: Corrected\n"
> +		       "UE: Uncorrected\n"
> +		       "checkcode/data:source\n"
> +		       "bit [0-63] for data [0-7] for checkcode:bit number\n");
> +}

...

> +static const struct npcm_edac_platform_data npcm7xx_edac = {
> +	.chip = NPCM7XX_CHIP,
> +
> +	/* CDNS DDR4 Controller Registers */
> +	.ecc_ctl_en_reg = 0x174,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_status = 0x1D0,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_ack = 0x1D4,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_mask_master = 0x1D8,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_c_addr_l = 0x188,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_data_l = 0x190,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id = 0x194,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd = 0x18C,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_u_addr_l = 0x17C,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_data_l = 0x184,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id = 0x194,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd = 0x180,
> +
> +	/* MASK */
> +	.ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask = BIT(24),
> +	.ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask = GENMASK(30, 7) | GENMASK(2, 0),
> +
> +	/* ECC IRQ Macros */
> +	.ecc_int_ce_event = BIT(3),
> +	.ecc_int_second_ce_event = BIT(4),
> +	.ecc_int_ue_event = BIT(5),
> +	.ecc_int_second_ue_event = BIT(6),
> +	.ecc_int_ce_ue_mask = GENMASK(6, 3),
> +	.ecc_ce_intr_mask = GENMASK(4, 3),
> +	.ecc_ue_intr_mask = GENMASK(6, 5),
> +
> +	/* ECC Signature Macros */
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id_shift = 16,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd_shift = 0,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id_mask = GENMASK(29, 16),
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd_mask = GENMASK(6, 0),
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id_shift = 0,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd_shift = 0,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id_mask = GENMASK(13, 0),
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd_mask = GENMASK(6, 0),
> +};
> +
> +static const struct npcm_edac_platform_data npcm8xx_edac = {
> +	.ip_features = FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT,
> +	.ddr_ctl_controller_busy_reg = 0x20C,
> +	.ecc_ctl_xor_check_bits_reg = 0x174,
> +
> +	.chip = NPCM8XX_CHIP,
> +
> +	/* CDNS DDR4 Controller Registers */
> +	.ddr_ctl_mem_type_reg = 0x000,
> +	.ddr_ctl_mem_width_reg = 0x00c,
> +
> +	.ecc_ctl_en_reg = 0x16C,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_status = 0x228,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_ack = 0x244,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_mask_master = 0x220,
> +	.ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc = 0x260,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_c_addr_l = 0x18C,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_addr_h = 0x190,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_data_l = 0x194,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_data_h = 0x198,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id = 0x19C,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd = 0x190,
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_u_addr_l = 0x17C,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_addr_h = 0x180,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_data_l = 0x184,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_data_h = 0x188,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id = 0x19C,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd = 0x180,
> +
> +	/* MASK */
> +	.ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask = GENMASK(17, 16),
> +	.ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask = GENMASK(30, 3) | GENMASK(1, 0),
> +	.ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask = GENMASK(8, 4),
> +
> +	/* ECC IRQ Macros */
> +	.ecc_int_ce_event = BIT(0),
> +	.ecc_int_second_ce_event = BIT(1),
> +	.ecc_int_ue_event = BIT(2),
> +	.ecc_int_second_ue_event = BIT(3),
> +	.ecc_int_ce_ue_mask = GENMASK(3, 0),
> +	.ecc_ce_intr_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> +	.ecc_ue_intr_mask = GENMASK(3, 2),
> +
> +	/* ECC Signature Macros */
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id_shift = 8,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd_shift = 8,
> +	.ecc_sig_c_addr_h_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> +	.ecc_sig_c_id_mask = GENMASK(29, 16),
> +	.ecc_sig_c_synd_mask = GENMASK(15, 8),
> +
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id_shift = 0,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd_shift = 8,
> +	.ecc_sig_u_addr_h_mask = GENMASK(1, 0),
> +	.ecc_sig_u_id_mask = GENMASK(13, 0),
> +	.ecc_sig_u_synd_mask = GENMASK(15, 8),

Now if you want to align something vertically, those would be great
candidates!

> +};
> +
> +static const struct of_device_id npcm_edac_of_match[] = {
> +	{ .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm750-memory-controller", .data = &npcm7xx_edac },
> +	{ .compatible = "nuvoton,npcm845-memory-controller", .data = &npcm8xx_edac },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, npcm_edac_of_match);
> +
> +static int npcm_edac_mc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)

No need for a "npcm_" prefix to static functions.

> +{
> +	const struct npcm_edac_platform_data *npcm_chip;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct edac_mc_layer layers[1];
> +	const struct of_device_id *id;
> +	struct priv_data *priv_data;
> +	struct mem_ctl_info *mci;
> +	struct resource *res;
> +	void __iomem *reg;
> +	int ret = -ENODEV;
> +	int irq;
> +	u32 ecc_en;
> +
> +	id = of_match_device(npcm_edac_of_match, &pdev->dev);

That function can return NULL.

> +	npcm_chip = of_device_get_match_data(&pdev->dev);

Ditto.

> +	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);

This one too.

Pls add proper error handling to all such functions you're calling.

> +	reg = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> +	if (IS_ERR(reg)) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "cdns DDR4 mc regs are not defined\n");

What's "cdns"? Is that message understandable to the normal user?

> +		return PTR_ERR(reg);
> +	}
> +
> +	ecc_en = readl(reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_reg);
> +
> +	if ((ecc_en & npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask) == npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_ecc_enable_mask) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "ECC reporting and correcting on. ");
> +	} else {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "ECC disabled\n");
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +	}
> +
> +	edac_printk(KERN_INFO, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "IO mapped reg addr: %p\n", reg);

What's that for?

> +
> +	layers[0].type = EDAC_MC_LAYER_ALL_MEM;
> +	layers[0].size = 1;
> +
> +	mci = edac_mc_alloc(0, ARRAY_SIZE(layers), layers,
> +			    sizeof(struct priv_data));

No need for that line break.

> +	if (!mci) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed memory allocation for mc instance\n");
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	mci->pdev = &pdev->dev;
> +	priv_data = mci->pvt_info;
> +	priv_data->reg = reg;
> +	priv_data->npcm_chip = npcm_chip;
> +	priv_data->ce_cnt = 0;
> +	priv_data->ue_cnt = 0;
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mci);
> +
> +	/* Initialize controller capabilities */
> +	mci->mtype_cap = MEM_FLAG_DDR4;
> +	mci->edac_ctl_cap = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
> +	mci->scrub_cap = SCRUB_FLAG_HW_SRC;
> +	mci->scrub_mode = SCRUB_HW_SRC;
> +	mci->edac_cap = EDAC_FLAG_SECDED;
> +	mci->ctl_name = id->compatible;
> +	mci->dev_name = dev_name(&pdev->dev);
> +	mci->mod_name = NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME;
> +	mci->ctl_page_to_phys = NULL;
> +
> +	/* Interrupt feature is supported by cadence mc */

No need for capitalizing "Interrupt".

> +	edac_op_state = EDAC_OPSTATE_INT;
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG))
> +		init_mem_layout(mci);
> +
> +	/* Set up Interrupt handler for ECC */

Ditto.

> +	irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> +	if (irq < 0) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "irq number not defined for ECC.\n");
> +		goto err;

You can do the IRQ set up first and then do edac_mc_alloc() so that you
don't need the "goto err" thing.

> +	}
> +	ret = devm_request_irq(dev, irq, edac_ecc_isr, 0, "cdns-edac-mc-ecc-irq", mci);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "request_irq fail for NPCM_EDAC irq\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +	ret = edac_mc_add_mc(mci);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to register with EDAC core\n");
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_EDAC_DEBUG) &&
> +	   (npcm_chip->ip_features & FORCED_ECC_ERR_EVENT_SUPPORT) &&
> +	    npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP) {
> +		if (create_sysfs_attributes(mci))
> +			edac_printk(KERN_ERR, NPCM_EDAC_MOD_NAME, "Failed to create sysfs entries\n");
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Only enable MC interrupts with ECC - clear global int mask bit and ecc bit */

s/ecc/ECC/g

> +	writel(npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_int_master_mask,
> +	       priv_data->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_mask_master);
> +
> +	if (npcm_chip->chip == NPCM8XX_CHIP) {
> +		/* clear single and multi for ce and ue */

"CE" ... "UE"

> +		writel(npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_en_int_ecc_mask,
> +		       priv_data->reg + npcm_chip->ecc_ctl_int_mask_ecc);
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +
> +	edac_mc_del_mc(&pdev->dev);

This looks like it is missing a label. Dead code - lovely.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ