[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220620193044.ihxfn6kddif7j5la@mobilestation>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:30:44 +0300
From: Serge Semin <fancer.lancer@...il.com>
To: Brad Larson <brad@...sando.io>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, adrian.hunter@...el.com,
alcooperx@...il.com, andy.shevchenko@...il.com, arnd@...db.de,
blarson@....com, brijeshkumar.singh@....com,
catalin.marinas@....com, gsomlo@...il.com, gerg@...ux-m68k.org,
krzk@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org,
lee.jones@...aro.org, broonie@...nel.org,
yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
piotrs@...ence.com, p.yadav@...com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, samuel@...lland.org,
suravee.suthikulpanit@....com, thomas.lendacky@....com,
ulf.hansson@...aro.org, will@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 04/15] dt-bindings: spi: dw: Add AMD Pensando Elba SoC
SPI Controller bindings
On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:56:47PM -0700, Brad Larson wrote:
> From: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
>
> The AMD Pensando Elba SoC has integrated the DW APB SPI Controller
>
> Signed-off-by: Brad Larson <blarson@....com>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> index e25d44c218f2..2a55b947cffc 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/spi/snps,dw-apb-ssi.yaml
> @@ -73,6 +73,8 @@ properties:
> - renesas,r9a06g032-spi # RZ/N1D
> - renesas,r9a06g033-spi # RZ/N1S
> - const: renesas,rzn1-spi # RZ/N1
> + - description: AMD Pensando Elba SoC SPI Controller
> + const: amd,pensando-elba-spi
Not enough. The driver requires to have a phandle reference to the
Pensando System Controller. So the property like
"amd,pensando-elba-syscon" is also needed to be added to the DT schema
otherwise should the dt-schema tool correctly handle the
"unevaluatedProperties: false" setting (Rob says it isn't fully
supported at the moment), the dtbs_check procedure will fail on your
dts evaluation.
-Sergey
>
> reg:
> minItems: 1
> --
> 2.17.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists