linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: also handle dma-noncoherent in of_dma_is

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:01:27 +0200
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To:     Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:     palmer@...belt.com, paul.walmsley@...ive.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        wefu@...hat.com, guoren@...nel.org, cmuellner@...ux.com,
        philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu, hch@....de, samuel@...lland.org,
        atishp@...shpatra.org, anup@...infault.org, mick@....forth.gr,
        robh+dt@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        drew@...gleboard.org, rdunlap@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] of: also handle dma-noncoherent in
 of_dma_is_coherent()

On Sun, Jun 19, 2022 at 10:32:09PM +0200, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
>  bool of_dma_is_coherent(struct device_node *np)
>  {
>  	struct device_node *node;
> +	bool ret = false;

I'd rename this to coherent or is_coherent.

>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT))
> -		return true;
> +		ret = true;

And then do this at initialization time:

	bool is_coherent = IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_DMA_DEFAULT_COHERENT);

but otherwise this looks good to me.