[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1a8e3e3a-1008-b52b-b7e9-117fd43e77d4@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 10:33:36 +0200
From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] mfd: intel_soc_pmic_chtwc: Use dev_err_probe()
Hi,
On 6/16/22 19:10, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> Simplify the mux error path a bit by using dev_err_probe().
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Thanks, patch looks good to me:
Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Regards,
Hans
> ---
> drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c | 19 +++++++------------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> index 4eab191e053a..1cbe2bcce530 100644
> --- a/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mfd/intel_soc_pmic_chtwc.c
> @@ -179,18 +179,13 @@ static int cht_wc_probe(struct i2c_client *client)
> int ret;
>
> status = acpi_evaluate_integer(ACPI_HANDLE(dev), "_HRV", NULL, &hrv);
> - if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - if (hrv != CHT_WC_HRV) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid PMIC hardware revision: %llu\n", hrv);
> - return -ENODEV;
> - }
> - if (client->irq < 0) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Invalid IRQ\n");
> - return -EINVAL;
> - }
> + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Failed to get PMIC hardware revision\n");
> + if (hrv != CHT_WC_HRV)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV, "Invalid PMIC hardware revision: %llu\n", hrv);
> +
> + if (client->irq < 0)
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Invalid IRQ\n");
>
> pmic = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pmic), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!pmic)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists