linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH V10 3/9] PCI: Create PCI library functions in support of DOE mailboxes.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 08:39:45 +0000
From:   "Zhuo, Qiuxu" <qiuxu.zhuo@...el.com>
To:     "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        "Williams, Dan J" <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "Jonathan Cameron" <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
CC:     Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
        Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
        "Weiny, Ira" <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
        "Schofield, Alison" <alison.schofield@...el.com>,
        "Verma, Vishal L" <vishal.l.verma@...el.com>,
        "Jiang, Dave" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        Ben Widawsky <ben@...dawsk.net>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org" <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V10 3/9] PCI: Create PCI library functions in support of
 DOE mailboxes.

> From: ira.weiny@...el.com <ira.weiny@...el.com>
> Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2022 8:51 AM
> ...
> +static void retire_cur_task(struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb) {
> +	spin_lock(&doe_mb->task_lock);
> +	doe_mb->cur_task = NULL;
> +	spin_unlock(&doe_mb->task_lock);
> +	wake_up_interruptible(&doe_mb->wq);
> +}
> +
> +static void doe_statemachine_work(struct work_struct *work) {
> +	struct delayed_work *w = to_delayed_work(work);
> +	struct pci_doe_mb *doe_mb = container_of(w, struct pci_doe_mb,
> +						 statemachine);
> +	struct pci_dev *pdev = doe_mb->pdev;
> +	int offset = doe_mb->cap_offset;
> +	enum pci_doe_state prev_state;
> +	struct pci_doe_task *task;
> +	u32 val;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	spin_lock(&doe_mb->task_lock);
> +	task = doe_mb->cur_task;
> +	spin_unlock(&doe_mb->task_lock);

              I don't think it needs the lock protection here. 
              No matter "task" is !NULL or NULL, it is checked before it's used within this function.

> +
> +	if (test_and_clear_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_ABORT, &doe_mb->flags)) {
> +		/*
> +		 * Currently only used during init - care needed if
> +		 * pci_doe_abort() is generally exposed as it would impact
> +		 * queries in flight.
> +		 */
> +		if (task)
> +			pci_err(pdev, "DOE [%x] Aborting with active task!\n",
> +				doe_mb->cap_offset);
> +		doe_mb->state = DOE_WAIT_ABORT;
> +		pci_doe_abort_start(doe_mb);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	switch (doe_mb->state) {
> +	case DOE_IDLE:
> +		if (task == NULL)
> +			return;
> +
> +		rc = pci_doe_send_req(doe_mb, task);
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * The specification does not provide any guidance on how
> long
> +		 * some other entity could keep the DOE busy, so try for 1
> +		 * second then fail. Busy handling is best effort only, because
> +		 * there is no way of avoiding racing against another user of
> +		 * the DOE.
> +		 */
> +		if (rc == -EBUSY) {
> +			doe_mb->busy_retries++;
> +			if (doe_mb->busy_retries ==
> PCI_DOE_BUSY_MAX_RETRIES) {
> +				/* Long enough, fail this request */
> +				pci_warn(pdev,
> +					"DOE [%x] busy for too long (> 1
> sec)\n",
> +					doe_mb->cap_offset);
> +				doe_mb->busy_retries = 0;
> +				goto err_busy;
> +			}
> +			schedule_delayed_work(w, HZ /
> PCI_DOE_BUSY_MAX_RETRIES);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +		if (rc)
> +			goto err_abort;
> +		doe_mb->busy_retries = 0;
> +
> +		doe_mb->state = DOE_WAIT_RESP;
> +		doe_mb->timeout_jiffies = jiffies + HZ;
> +		/* Now poll or wait for IRQ with timeout */
> +		if (doe_mb->irq >= 0)
> +			schedule_delayed_work(w, PCI_DOE_TIMEOUT);
> +		else
> +			schedule_delayed_work(w, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL);
> +		return;
> +
> +	case DOE_WAIT_RESP:
> +		/* Not possible to get here with NULL task */
> +		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_STATUS,
> &val);
> +		if (FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_STATUS_ERROR, val)) {
> +			rc = -EIO;
> +			goto err_abort;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (!FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_STATUS_DATA_OBJECT_READY, val))
> {
> +			/* If not yet at timeout reschedule otherwise abort
> */
> +			if (time_after(jiffies, doe_mb->timeout_jiffies)) {
> +				rc = -ETIMEDOUT;
> +				goto err_abort;
> +			}
> +			schedule_delayed_work(w, PCI_DOE_POLL_INTERVAL);
> +			return;
> +		}
> +
> +		rc  = pci_doe_recv_resp(doe_mb, task);
> +		if (rc < 0)
> +			goto err_abort;
> +
> +		doe_mb->state = DOE_IDLE;
> +
> +		retire_cur_task(doe_mb);
> +		/* Set the return value to the length of received payload */
> +		signal_task_complete(task, rc);
> +
> +		return;
> +
> +	case DOE_WAIT_ABORT:
> +	case DOE_WAIT_ABORT_ON_ERR:
> +		prev_state = doe_mb->state;
> +
> +		pci_read_config_dword(pdev, offset + PCI_DOE_STATUS,
> &val);
> +
> +		if (!FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_STATUS_ERROR, val) &&
> +		    !FIELD_GET(PCI_DOE_STATUS_BUSY, val)) {
> +			doe_mb->state = DOE_IDLE;
> +			/* Back to normal state - carry on */
> +			retire_cur_task(doe_mb);
> +		} else if (time_after(jiffies, doe_mb->timeout_jiffies)) {
> +			/* Task has timed out and is dead - abort */
> +			pci_err(pdev, "DOE [%x] ABORT timed out\n",
> +				doe_mb->cap_offset);
> +			set_bit(PCI_DOE_FLAG_DEAD, &doe_mb->flags);
> +			retire_cur_task(doe_mb);
> +		}
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * For deliberately triggered abort, someone is
> +		 * waiting.
> +		 */
> +		if (prev_state == DOE_WAIT_ABORT) {
> +			if (task)
> +				signal_task_complete(task, -EFAULT);
> +			complete(&doe_mb->abort_c);
> +		}
> +
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +err_abort:
> +	doe_mb->state = DOE_WAIT_ABORT_ON_ERR;
> +	pci_doe_abort_start(doe_mb);
> +err_busy:
> +	signal_task_complete(task, rc);
> +	if (doe_mb->state == DOE_IDLE)
> +		retire_cur_task(doe_mb);
> +}