[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACGkMEsEq3mu6unXx1VZuEFgDCotOc9v7fcwJG-kXEqs6hXYYg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 17:18:29 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
davem <davem@...emloft.net>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
erwan.yvin@...ricsson.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] caif_virtio: fix the race between reset and netdev unregister
On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:09 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@...hat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 01:11:15PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > We use to do the following steps during .remove():
>
> We currently do
>
>
> > static void cfv_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > {
> > struct cfv_info *cfv = vdev->priv;
> >
> > rtnl_lock();
> > dev_close(cfv->ndev);
> > rtnl_unlock();
> >
> > tasklet_kill(&cfv->tx_release_tasklet);
> > debugfs_remove_recursive(cfv->debugfs);
> >
> > vringh_kiov_cleanup(&cfv->ctx.riov);
> > virtio_reset_device(vdev);
> > vdev->vringh_config->del_vrhs(cfv->vdev);
> > cfv->vr_rx = NULL;
> > vdev->config->del_vqs(cfv->vdev);
> > unregister_netdev(cfv->ndev);
> > }
> > This is racy since device could be re-opened after dev_close() but
> > before unregister_netdevice():
> >
> > 1) RX vringh is cleaned before resetting the device, rx callbacks that
> > is called after the vringh_kiov_cleanup() will result a UAF
> > 2) Network stack can still try to use TX virtqueue even if it has been
> > deleted after dev_vqs()
> >
> > Fixing this by unregistering the network device first to make sure not
> > device access from both TX and RX side.
> >
> > Fixes: 0d2e1a2926b18 ("caif_virtio: Introduce caif over virtio")
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c | 6 ++----
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c b/drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > index 66375bea2fcd..a29f9b2df5b1 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/caif/caif_virtio.c
> > @@ -752,9 +752,8 @@ static void cfv_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > {
> > struct cfv_info *cfv = vdev->priv;
> >
> > - rtnl_lock();
> > - dev_close(cfv->ndev);
> > - rtnl_unlock();
> > + /* Make sure NAPI/TX won't try to access the device */
> > + unregister_netdev(cfv->ndev);
> >
> > tasklet_kill(&cfv->tx_release_tasklet);
> > debugfs_remove_recursive(cfv->debugfs);
> > @@ -764,7 +763,6 @@ static void cfv_remove(struct virtio_device *vdev)
> > vdev->vringh_config->del_vrhs(cfv->vdev);
> > cfv->vr_rx = NULL;
> > vdev->config->del_vqs(cfv->vdev);
> > - unregister_netdev(cfv->ndev);
> > }
>
>
> This gives me pause, callbacks can now trigger after device
> has been unregistered. Are we sure this is safe?
It looks safe, for RX NAPI is disabled. For TX, tasklet is disabled
after tasklet_kill(). I can add a comment to explain this.
> Won't it be safer to just keep the rtnl_lock around
> the whole process?
It looks to me we rtnl_lock can't help in synchronizing with the
callbacks, anything I miss?
Thanks
>
> > static struct virtio_device_id id_table[] = {
> > --
> > 2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists