| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20220620124831.g7bswgivvg5urv3d@quack3.lan>
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:48:31 +0200
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
Cc: axboe@...nel.dk, ming.lei@...hat.com, jack@...e.cz,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
yi.zhang@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -next] sbitmap: fix possible io hung due to lost
wakeups
On Mon 20-06-22 14:24:13, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Fri 17-06-22 22:11:25, Yu Kuai wrote:
> > Currently, same waitqueue might be woken up continuously:
> >
> > __sbq_wake_up __sbq_wake_up
> > sbq_wake_ptr -> assume 0
> > sbq_wake_ptr -> 0
> > atomic_dec_return
> > atomic_dec_return
> > atomic_cmpxchg -> succeed
> > atomic_cmpxchg -> failed
> > return true
> >
> > __sbq_wake_up
> > sbq_wake_ptr
> > atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index) -> still 0
> > sbq_index_atomic_inc -> inc to 1
> > if (waitqueue_active(&ws->wait))
> > if (wake_index != atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index))
> > atomic_set -> reset from 1 to 0
> > wake_up_nr -> wake up first waitqueue
> > // continue to wake up in first waitqueue
> >
> > What's worse, io hung is possible in theory because wakeups might be
> > missed. For example, 2 * wake_batch tags are put, while only wake_batch
> > threads are worken:
> >
> > __sbq_wake_up
> > atomic_cmpxchg -> reset wait_cnt
> > __sbq_wake_up -> decrease wait_cnt
> > ...
> > __sbq_wake_up -> wait_cnt is decreased to 0 again
> > atomic_cmpxchg
> > sbq_index_atomic_inc -> increase wake_index
> > wake_up_nr -> wake up and waitqueue might be empty
> > sbq_index_atomic_inc -> increase again, one waitqueue is skipped
> > wake_up_nr -> invalid wake up because old wakequeue might be empty
> >
> > To fix the problem, refactor to make sure waitqueues will be woken up
> > one by one,
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@...wei.com>
>
> So as far as I can tell your patch does not completely fix this race. See
> below:
>
> > diff --git a/lib/sbitmap.c b/lib/sbitmap.c
> > index ae4fd4de9ebe..dc2959cb188c 100644
> > --- a/lib/sbitmap.c
> > +++ b/lib/sbitmap.c
> > @@ -574,66 +574,69 @@ void sbitmap_queue_min_shallow_depth(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sbitmap_queue_min_shallow_depth);
> >
> > -static struct sbq_wait_state *sbq_wake_ptr(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
> > +static void sbq_update_wake_index(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq,
> > + int old_wake_index)
> > {
> > int i, wake_index;
> > -
> > - if (!atomic_read(&sbq->ws_active))
> > - return NULL;
> > + struct sbq_wait_state *ws;
> >
> > wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
> > - for (i = 0; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
> > - struct sbq_wait_state *ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];
> > + if (old_wake_index != wake_index)
> > + return;
> >
> > + for (i = 1; i < SBQ_WAIT_QUEUES; i++) {
> > + wake_index = sbq_index_inc(wake_index);
> > + ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];
> > + /* Find the next active waitqueue in round robin manner */
> > if (waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) {
> > - if (wake_index != atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index))
> > - atomic_set(&sbq->wake_index, wake_index);
> > - return ws;
> > + atomic_cmpxchg(&sbq->wake_index, old_wake_index,
> > + wake_index);
> > + return;
> > }
> > -
> > - wake_index = sbq_index_inc(wake_index);
> > }
> > -
> > - return NULL;
> > }
> >
> > static bool __sbq_wake_up(struct sbitmap_queue *sbq)
> > {
> > struct sbq_wait_state *ws;
> > unsigned int wake_batch;
> > - int wait_cnt;
> > + int wait_cnt, wake_index;
> >
> > - ws = sbq_wake_ptr(sbq);
> > - if (!ws)
> > + if (!atomic_read(&sbq->ws_active))
> > return false;
> >
> > - wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
> > - if (wait_cnt <= 0) {
> > - int ret;
> > -
> > - wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_resize() to
> > - * ensure that we see the batch size update before the wait
> > - * count is reset.
> > - */
> > - smp_mb__before_atomic();
> > + wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
> > + ws = &sbq->ws[wake_index];
> > + /*
> > + * This can only happen in the first wakeup when sbitmap waitqueues
> > + * are no longer idle.
> > + */
> > + if (!waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) {
> > + sbq_update_wake_index(sbq, wake_index);
> > + return true;
> > + }
> >
> > - /*
> > - * For concurrent callers of this, the one that failed the
> > - * atomic_cmpxhcg() race should call this function again
> > - * to wakeup a new batch on a different 'ws'.
> > - */
> > - ret = atomic_cmpxchg(&ws->wait_cnt, wait_cnt, wake_batch);
> > - if (ret == wait_cnt) {
> > - sbq_index_atomic_inc(&sbq->wake_index);
> > - wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
> > - return false;
> > - }
> > + wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
> > + if (wait_cnt > 0)
> > + return false;
>
> The following race is still possible:
>
> CPU1 CPU2
> __sbq_wake_up __sbq_wake_up
> wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
> wake_index = atomic_read(&sbq->wake_index);
>
> if (!waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) -> not taken
> if (!waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) -> not taken
> wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
> /* decremented to 0 now */
> if (wait_cnt > 0) -> not taken
> sbq_update_wake_index(sbq, wake_index);
> if (wait_cnt < 0) -> not taken
> ...
> atomic_set(&ws->wait_cnt, wake_batch);
> wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
> wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
> /*
> * decremented to wake_batch - 1 but
> * there are no tasks waiting anymore
> * so the wakeup should have gone
> * to a different waitqueue.
> */
>
> I have an idea how to fix all these lost wakeups, I'll try to code it
> whether it would look usable...
Thinking a bit more about it your code would just need a small tweak like:
wait_cnt = atomic_dec_return(&ws->wait_cnt);
/*
* Concurrent callers should call this function again
* to wakeup a new batch on a different 'ws'.
*/
if (wait_cnt < 0 || !waitqueue_active(&ws->wait)) {
sbq_update_wake_index(sbq, wake_index);
return true;
}
if (wait_cnt > 0)
return false;
sbq_update_wake_index(sbq, wake_index);
wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
/*
* Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_resize() to
* ensure that we see the batch size update before the wait
* count is reset.
*
* Also pairs with the implicit barrier between decrementing
* wait_cnt and checking for waitqueue_active() to make sure
* waitqueue_active() sees results of the wakeup if
* atomic_dec_return() has seen results of the atomic_set.
*/
smp_mb__before_atomic();
atomic_set(&ws->wait_cnt, wake_batch);
Honza
> > + sbq_update_wake_index(sbq, wake_index);
> > + /*
> > + * Concurrent callers should call this function again
> > + * to wakeup a new batch on a different 'ws'.
> > + */
> > + if (wait_cnt < 0)
> > return true;
> > - }
> > +
> > + wake_batch = READ_ONCE(sbq->wake_batch);
> > + /*
> > + * Pairs with the memory barrier in sbitmap_queue_resize() to
> > + * ensure that we see the batch size update before the wait
> > + * count is reset.
> > + */
> > + smp_mb__before_atomic();
> > + atomic_set(&ws->wait_cnt, wake_batch);
> > + wake_up_nr(&ws->wait, wake_batch);
> >
> > return false;
> > }
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >
> --
> Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
> SUSE Labs, CR
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists