linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.18 130/141] ext4: add reserved GDT blocks check

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20220620124733.399180590@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 14:51:08 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org,
        Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>,
        Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>,
        Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Theodore Tso <tytso@....edu>
Subject: [PATCH 5.18 130/141] ext4: add reserved GDT blocks check

From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>

commit b55c3cd102a6f48b90e61c44f7f3dda8c290c694 upstream.

We capture a NULL pointer issue when resizing a corrupt ext4 image which
is freshly clear resize_inode feature (not run e2fsck). It could be
simply reproduced by following steps. The problem is because of the
resize_inode feature was cleared, and it will convert the filesystem to
meta_bg mode in ext4_resize_fs(), but the es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks was
not reduced to zero, so could we mistakenly call reserve_backup_gdb()
and passing an uninitialized resize_inode to it when adding new group
descriptors.

 mkfs.ext4 /dev/sda 3G
 tune2fs -O ^resize_inode /dev/sda #forget to run requested e2fsck
 mount /dev/sda /mnt
 resize2fs /dev/sda 8G

 ========
 BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000028
 CPU: 19 PID: 3243 Comm: resize2fs Not tainted 5.18.0-rc7-00001-gfde086c5ebfd #748
 ...
 RIP: 0010:ext4_flex_group_add+0xe08/0x2570
 ...
 Call Trace:
  <TASK>
  ext4_resize_fs+0xbec/0x1660
  __ext4_ioctl+0x1749/0x24e0
  ext4_ioctl+0x12/0x20
  __x64_sys_ioctl+0xa6/0x110
  do_syscall_64+0x3b/0x90
  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae
 RIP: 0033:0x7f2dd739617b
 ========

The fix is simple, add a check in ext4_resize_begin() to make sure that
the es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks is zero when the resize_inode feature is
disabled.

Cc: stable@...nel.org
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Reviewed-by: Ritesh Harjani <ritesh.list@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220601092717.763694-1-yi.zhang@huawei.com
Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/ext4/resize.c |   10 ++++++++++
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)

--- a/fs/ext4/resize.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/resize.c
@@ -54,6 +54,16 @@ int ext4_resize_begin(struct super_block
 		return -EPERM;
 
 	/*
+	 * If the reserved GDT blocks is non-zero, the resize_inode feature
+	 * should always be set.
+	 */
+	if (EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_reserved_gdt_blocks &&
+	    !ext4_has_feature_resize_inode(sb)) {
+		ext4_error(sb, "resize_inode disabled but reserved GDT blocks non-zero");
+		return -EFSCORRUPTED;
+	}
+
+	/*
 	 * If we are not using the primary superblock/GDT copy don't resize,
          * because the user tools have no way of handling this.  Probably a
          * bad time to do it anyways.