[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220620025726.GA5219@nvidia.com>
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2022 23:57:26 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@...dia.com>, kwankhede@...dia.com,
corbet@....net, hca@...ux.ibm.com, gor@...ux.ibm.com,
agordeev@...ux.ibm.com, borntraeger@...ux.ibm.com,
svens@...ux.ibm.com, zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com, zhi.a.wang@...el.com,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com,
rodrigo.vivi@...el.com, tvrtko.ursulin@...ux.intel.com,
airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, farman@...ux.ibm.com,
mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com, vneethv@...ux.ibm.com,
oberpar@...ux.ibm.com, freude@...ux.ibm.com,
akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com, jjherne@...ux.ibm.com,
alex.williamson@...hat.com, cohuck@...hat.com,
kevin.tian@...el.com, jchrist@...ux.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFT][PATCH v1 5/6] vfio/ccw: Add kmap_local_page() for memcpy
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 01:44:30AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 04:52:11PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:
> > The pinned PFN list returned from vfio_pin_pages() is simply converted
> > using page_to_pfn() without protection, so direct access via memcpy()
> > will crash on S390 if the PFN is an IO PFN. Instead, the pages should
> > be touched using kmap_local_page().
>
> I don't see how this helps. kmap_local_page only works for either
> pages in the kernel direct map or highmem, but not for memory that needs
> to be ioremapped. And there is no highmem on s390.
The remark about io memory is because on s390 memcpy() will crash even
on ioremapped memory, you have to use the memcpy_to/fromio() which
uses the special s390 io access instructions.
This helps because we now block io memory from ever getting into these
call paths. I'm pretty sure this is a serious security bug, but would
let the IBM folks remark as I don't know it all that well..
As for the kmap, I thought it was standard practice even if it is a
non-highmem? Aren't people trying to use this for other security
stuff these days?
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists