linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: sun50i-codec-analog: Add support for internal bias

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <743a2629-f1a4-a12a-a7c0-90a2a28b68b4@sholland.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Jun 2022 22:53:30 -0500
From:   Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
To:     Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:     Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
        Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
        Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Arnaud Ferraris <arnaud.ferraris@...labora.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
        Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] ASoC: sun50i-codec-analog: Add support for internal
 bias

On 6/16/22 3:28 AM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 01:25:53AM -0500, Samuel Holland wrote:
> 
>> +static int sun50i_a64_codec_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
>> +{
>> +	struct sun50i_codec_analog *codec = snd_soc_component_get_drvdata(component);
>> +
>> +	regmap_update_bits(component->regmap, SUN50I_ADDA_JACK_MIC_CTRL,
>> +			   BIT(SUN50I_ADDA_JACK_MIC_CTRL_INNERRESEN),
>> +			   codec->internal_bias_resistor <<
>> +				SUN50I_ADDA_JACK_MIC_CTRL_INNERRESEN);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
> 
> It doesn't make much practical difference but is there any reason this
> can't be done in the main device probe?

There's no particular reason, and doing it in the device probe would be much
simpler. I'll do that for v2.

Regards,
Samuel