linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: fix IPQ8074 Gen2 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:29:08 +0300
From:   Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To:     Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
Cc:     svarbanov@...sol.com, agross@...nel.org,
        bjorn.andersson@...aro.org, lpieralisi@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
        kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        jingoohan1@...il.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        johan+linaro@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: qcom: fix IPQ8074 Gen2 support

On Tue, 21 Jun 2022 at 14:23, Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> IPQ8074 has one Gen2 and one Gen3 port, currently the Gen2 port will
> cause the system to hang as its using DBI registers in the .init
> and those are only accesible after phy_power_on().
>
> So solve this by splitting the DBI read/writes to .post_init.
>
> Fixes: a0fd361db8e5 ("PCI: dwc: Move "dbi", "dbi2", and "addr_space" resource setup into common code")

Any elaboration for the Fixes tag? I think the follow one is more
logical, isn't it?

Fixes: 5d76117f070d ("PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ8074 PCIe controller")

> Signed-off-by: Robert Marko <robimarko@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> * Rebase onto next-20220621
> ---
>  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 48 +++++++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> index 51fed83484af..da6d79d61397 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> @@ -1061,9 +1061,7 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>         struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_3_3 *res = &pcie->res.v2_3_3;
>         struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
>         struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> -       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
>         int i, ret;
> -       u32 val;
>
>         for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++) {
>                 ret = reset_control_assert(res->rst[i]);
> @@ -1120,6 +1118,33 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>                 goto err_clk_aux;
>         }
>
> +       return 0;
> +
> +err_clk_aux:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> +err_clk_ahb:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_s:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> +err_clk_axi_m:
> +       clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> +err_clk_iface:
> +       /*
> +        * Not checking for failure, will anyway return
> +        * the original failure in 'ret'.
> +        */
> +       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++)
> +               reset_control_assert(res->rst[i]);
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> +{
> +       struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> +       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> +       u32 val;
> +
>         writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ,
>                 pcie->parf + PCIE20_v3_PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
>
> @@ -1147,24 +1172,6 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_3_3(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
>                 PCI_EXP_DEVCTL2);
>
>         return 0;
> -
> -err_clk_aux:
> -       clk_disable_unprepare(res->ahb_clk);
> -err_clk_ahb:
> -       clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_s_clk);
> -err_clk_axi_s:
> -       clk_disable_unprepare(res->axi_m_clk);
> -err_clk_axi_m:
> -       clk_disable_unprepare(res->iface);
> -err_clk_iface:
> -       /*
> -        * Not checking for failure, will anyway return
> -        * the original failure in 'ret'.
> -        */
> -       for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(res->rst); i++)
> -               reset_control_assert(res->rst[i]);
> -
> -       return ret;
>  }
>
>  static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_7_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> @@ -1598,6 +1605,7 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_4_0 = {
>  static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_3_3 = {
>         .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_3_3,
>         .init = qcom_pcie_init_2_3_3,
> +       .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_2_3_3,
>         .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_2_3_3,
>         .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable,
>  };
> --
> 2.36.1
>


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry