linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <165583954166.3333585.2295158486736398663.b4-ty@arm.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 20:27:29 +0100
From:   Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@....com>
Cc:     Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        nicola.mazzucato@....com, robin.murphy@....com,
        f.fainelli@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks

On Thu, 16 Jun 2022 18:03:47 +0100, Cristian Marussi wrote:
> A reply to CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES issued against a non rate-discrete clock
> should be composed of a triplet of rates descriptors (min/max/step)
> returned all in one reply message.
> 
> This is not always the case when dealing with some SCMI server deployed in
> the wild: relax such constraint while maintaining memory safety by checking
> carefully the returned payload size.
> 
> [...]

Applied to sudeep.holla/linux (for-next/scmi), thanks!

[1/1] firmware: arm_scmi: Relax CLOCK_DESCRIBE_RATES out-of-spec checks
      https://git.kernel.org/sudeep.holla/c/754f04cac3

--
Regards,
Sudeep