lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <46fcdf08-4646-afa0-c112-76d9335adb6c@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 08:11:49 +0200
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org, pmladek@...e.com
Cc:     rostedt@...dmis.org, enozhatsky@...omium.org, willy@...radead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/34] Printbufs - new data structure for building
 strings

On 20/06/2022 02.41, Kent Overstreet wrote:

>   Rasmus pointed out that -fno-strict-aliasing is going to cause gcc to generate
>   nasty code, and indeed it unfortunately does but according to worst case
>   scenario microbenchmarks it's not a problem for actual performance. 

Well, that's not how I interpreted those numbers, but, except if they
showed an improvement, how much is acceptable is of course always a
matter of judgment.

However, what's really annoying and somewhat dishonest is that you're
not including those numbers, nor the methodology, in either the cover
letter or commit itself.

Rasmus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ