linux-kernel - Re: [net-next: PATCH 01/12] net: phy: fixed_phy: switch to fwnode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPv3WKe3vBJ9r=6tMEtPj-3c0E3MBpW4Csf8zjS0jG03C35ycg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Jun 2022 11:56:06 +0200
From:   Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>
To:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc:     Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
        netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
        Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, vivien.didelot@...il.com,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, pabeni@...hat.com,
        Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Grzegorz Bernacki <gjb@...ihalf.com>,
        Grzegorz Jaszczyk <jaz@...ihalf.com>,
        Tomasz Nowicki <tn@...ihalf.com>,
        Samer El-Haj-Mahmoud <Samer.El-Haj-Mahmoud@....com>,
        upstream@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH 01/12] net: phy: fixed_phy: switch to fwnode_ API

pon., 20 cze 2022 o 19:59 Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> napisał(a):
>
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 05:02:14PM +0200, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> > This patch allows to use fixed_phy driver and its helper
> > functions without Device Tree dependency, by swtiching from
> > of_ to fwnode_ API.
>
> Do you actually need this? phylink does not use this code, it has its
> own fixed link implementation. And that implementation is not limited
> to 1G.
>

Yes, phylink has its own fixed-link handling, however the
net/dsa/port.c relies on fixed_phy helpers these are not 1:1
equivalents. I assumed this migration (fixed_phy -> phylink) is not
straightforward and IMO should be handled separately. Do you recall
justification for not using phylink in this part of net/dsa/*?

Thanks,
Marcin