[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <248317a0-2ef4-c619-15b5-84e2b62aab5e@quicinc.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 15:43:30 +0530
From: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>, <rcu@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>,
<rostedt@...dmis.org>, Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rcu 12/12] srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited
grace periods
On 6/21/2022 3:50 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Commit 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
> from consuming CPU") fixed a problem where a long-running expedited SRCU
> grace period could block kernel live patching. It did so by giving up
> on expediting once a given SRCU expedited grace period grew too old.
>
> Unfortunately, this added excessive delays to boots of embedded systems
> running on qemu that use the ARM IORT RMR feature. This commit therefore
> makes the transition away from expediting less aggressive, increasing
> the per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping polls of readers from
> one to three and increasing the required grace-period age from one jiffy
> (actually from zero to one jiffies) to two jiffies (actually from one
> to two jiffies).
>
> Fixes: 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers from consuming CPU")
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
> Reported-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>
> Reported-by: chenxiang (M)" <chenxiang66@...ilicon.com>
> Cc: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20615615-0013-5adc-584f-2b1d5c03ebfc@linaro.org/
> ---
Reviewed-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@...cinc.com>
Thanks
Neeraj
> kernel/rcu/srcutree.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> index 50ba70f019dea..0db7873f4e95b 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/srcutree.c
> @@ -513,7 +513,7 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
>
> #define SRCU_INTERVAL 1 // Base delay if no expedited GPs pending.
> #define SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL 10 // Maximum incremental delay from slow readers.
> -#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE 1 // Maximum per-GP-phase consecutive no-delay instances.
> +#define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE 3 // Maximum per-GP-phase consecutive no-delay instances.
> #define SRCU_MAX_NODELAY 100 // Maximum consecutive no-delay instances.
>
> /*
> @@ -522,16 +522,22 @@ static bool srcu_readers_active(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> */
> static unsigned long srcu_get_delay(struct srcu_struct *ssp)
> {
> + unsigned long gpstart;
> + unsigned long j;
> unsigned long jbase = SRCU_INTERVAL;
>
> if (ULONG_CMP_LT(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq), READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq_needed_exp)))
> jbase = 0;
> - if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq)))
> - jbase += jiffies - READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_start);
> - if (!jbase) {
> - WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1);
> - if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE)
> - jbase = 1;
> + if (rcu_seq_state(READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_seq))) {
> + j = jiffies - 1;
> + gpstart = READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_gp_start);
> + if (time_after(j, gpstart))
> + jbase += j - gpstart;
> + if (!jbase) {
> + WRITE_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay, READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) + 1);
> + if (READ_ONCE(ssp->srcu_n_exp_nodelay) > SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE)
> + jbase = 1;
> + }
> }
> return jbase > SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL ? SRCU_MAX_INTERVAL : jbase;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists