[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0862532b568f7e13b89b6537928efd518a2971a3.camel@mediatek.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2022 10:32:30 +0800
From: CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
To: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@...nel.org>,
<p.zabel@...gutronix.de>, <daniel@...ll.ch>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
<airlied@...ux.ie>
CC: <msp@...libre.com>, <granquet@...libre.com>,
<jitao.shi@...iatek.com>, <wenst@...omium.org>,
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@...iatek.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 10/14] drm/mediatek: dpi: Add dpintf support
Hi, Bo-Chen:
On Mon, 2022-06-20 at 20:10 +0800, Bo-Chen Chen wrote:
> From: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
>
> dpintf is the displayport interface hardware unit. This unit is
> similar
> to dpi and can reuse most of the code.
>
> This patch adds support for mt8195-dpintf to this dpi driver. Main
> differences are:
> - 4 pixels for one round for dp_intf while dpi is 1 pixel for one
> round.
> Therefore, pixel clock and timing parameter should be divided by 4
> for
> dp_intf.
> - Some features/functional components are not available for dpintf
> which are now excluded from code execution once is_dpintf is set.
> The main difference is some parts of hardware design between
> dp_intf
> and dpi.
> - Some register contents differ slightly between the two components.
> To
> work around this I added register bits/masks with a DPINTF_ prefix
> and use them where different.
>
> Based on a separate driver for dpintf created by
> Jitao shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>.
>
> Signed-off-by: Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@...libre.com>
> Signed-off-by: Guillaume Ranquet <granquet@...libre.com>
> [Bo-Chen: Modify reviewers' comments.]
> Signed-off-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@...iatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c | 65
> +++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi_regs.h | 13 +++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.c | 4 ++
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_ddp_comp.h | 1 +
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_drm_drv.c | 3 +
> 5 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> index e186870ba3bc..2717b1741b7a 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dpi.c
> @@ -126,6 +126,7 @@ struct mtk_dpi_conf {
> const u32 *output_fmts;
> u32 num_output_fmts;
> bool is_ck_de_pol;
> + bool is_dpintf;
> bool swap_input_support;
> /* Mask used for HWIDTH, HPORCH, VSYNC_WIDTH and VSYNC_PORCH
> (no shift) */
> u32 dimension_mask;
> @@ -513,6 +514,14 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct
> mtk_dpi *dpi,
> pll_rate = clk_get_rate(dpi->tvd_clk);
>
> vm.pixelclock = pll_rate / factor;
> +
> + /*
> + * For dp_intf, we need to divide clock by 4 because it's
> + * 4 pixels for one round while dpi is 1 pixel for one round.
> + */
> + if (dpi->conf->is_dpintf)
> + vm.pixelclock /= 4;
I this this should define dpi->conf->round_pixels rather than dpi-
>conf->is_dpintf.
> +
> if ((dpi->output_fmt == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_LE) ||
> (dpi->output_fmt == MEDIA_BUS_FMT_RGB888_2X12_BE))
> clk_set_rate(dpi->pixel_clk, vm.pixelclock * 2);
> @@ -534,6 +543,17 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct
> mtk_dpi *dpi,
> hsync.sync_width = vm.hsync_len;
> hsync.back_porch = vm.hback_porch;
> hsync.front_porch = vm.hfront_porch;
> +
> + /*
> + * For dp_intf, we need to divide everything by 4 because it's
> + * 4 pixels for one round while dpi is 1 pixel for one round.
> + */
> + if (dpi->conf->is_dpintf) {
> + hsync.sync_width = vm.hsync_len / 4;
> + hsync.back_porch = vm.hback_porch / 4;
> + hsync.front_porch = vm.hfront_porch / 4;
> + }
Ditto.
> +
> hsync.shift_half_line = false;
> vsync_lodd.sync_width = vm.vsync_len;
> vsync_lodd.back_porch = vm.vback_porch;
> @@ -575,11 +595,16 @@ static int mtk_dpi_set_display_mode(struct
> mtk_dpi *dpi,
> mtk_dpi_config_channel_limit(dpi);
> mtk_dpi_config_bit_num(dpi, dpi->bit_num);
> mtk_dpi_config_channel_swap(dpi, dpi->channel_swap);
> - mtk_dpi_config_yc_map(dpi, dpi->yc_map);
> mtk_dpi_config_color_format(dpi, dpi->color_format);
> - mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> - mtk_dpi_dual_edge(dpi);
> - mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> + if (dpi->conf->is_dpintf) {
Separate this to an independent patch and give a better config name
rather than dpi->conf->is_dpintf.
> + mtk_dpi_mask(dpi, DPI_CON, DPINTF_INPUT_2P_EN,
> + DPINTF_INPUT_2P_EN);
> + } else {
> + mtk_dpi_config_yc_map(dpi, dpi->yc_map);
> + mtk_dpi_config_2n_h_fre(dpi);
> + mtk_dpi_dual_edge(dpi);
> + mtk_dpi_config_disable_edge(dpi);
> + }
> mtk_dpi_sw_reset(dpi, false);
>
> return 0;
> @@ -817,6 +842,16 @@ static unsigned int mt8183_calculate_factor(int
> clock)
> return 2;
> }
>
[snip]
>
> #define EDGE_SEL_EN BIT(5)
> #define H_FRE_2N BIT(25)
> +
This seems not related to dpintf support.
Regards,
CK
> #endif /* __MTK_DPI_REGS_H */
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists