[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <687fcc3e-5ccc-78ce-fae3-98afe3dc5341@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 17:24:35 +0200
From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
To: Adrian Larumbe <adrianml@...mnos.upm.es>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmaengine: remove DMA_MEMCPY_SG once again
On 6/22/22 16:50, Adrian Larumbe wrote:
> CAUTION: This message has originated from an External Source. Please use proper judgment and caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding to this email.
>
>
> On 07.06.2022 09:33, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> There are no clients in mainline which call this API. There is a driver
>> which implements this API, but no users...
>>
>> $ git grep dmaengine_prep_dma_memcpy_sg
>> include/linux/dmaengine.h:static inline struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *dmaengine_prep_dma_memcpy_sg(
>
> This is true, when I sent this I thought my at the time employer had already
> upstreamed their driver changes which make this of this API call, but apparently
> it never happened after I left.
>
> In this wise, this change series should probably go away altogether, even if
> that means it leaves that driver feature unutilised.
We also don't have a need for it. Driver which was using it is no longer used
that's why not a problem to remove it.
That's why
Acked-by: Michal Simek <michal.simek@....com>
Thanks,
Michal
Powered by blists - more mailing lists