[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20220622162213.13959-1-jiangjian@cdjrlc.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 00:22:13 +0800
From: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@...rlc.com>
To: jgg@...pe.ca, leon@...nel.org
Cc: jiangjian@...rlc.com, linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] RDMA/core: drop unexpected word 'is' in the comments
there is an unexpected word 'is' in the comments that need to be dropped
file: drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
line: 71
* access locks, since only a single one of them is is allowed
changed to:
* access locks, since only a single one of them is allowed
Signed-off-by: Jiang Jian <jiangjian@...rlc.com>
---
drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
index 94d83b665a2f..29b1ab1d5f93 100644
--- a/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
+++ b/drivers/infiniband/core/rdma_core.c
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ static int uverbs_try_lock_object(struct ib_uobject *uobj,
* In exclusive access mode, we check that the counter is zero (nobody
* claimed this object) and we set it to -1. Releasing a shared access
* lock is done simply by decreasing the counter. As for exclusive
- * access locks, since only a single one of them is is allowed
+ * access locks, since only a single one of them is allowed
* concurrently, setting the counter to zero is enough for releasing
* this lock.
*/
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists