[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87letod4v3.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 11:45:20 -0500
From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...nel.org,
bigeasy@...utronix.de, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...ux.ibm.com>,
Robert O'Callahan <roc@...nos.co>, Kyle Huey <khuey@...nos.co>,
Keno Fischer <keno@...iacomputing.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] signal: Ensure SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT gets set in do_group_exit
The function do_group_exit has an optimization that avoids taking
siglock and doing the work to find other threads in the signal group
and shutting them down.
It is very desirable for SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT to always been set whenever
it is decided for the process to exit. That ensures only a single
place needs to be tested, and a single bit of state needs to be looked
at. This makes the optimization in do_group_exit counter productive.
Make the code and maintenance simpler by removing this unnecessary
option.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
---
kernel/exit.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index f072959fcab7..96e4b12edea8 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@ do_group_exit(int exit_code)
exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
else if (sig->group_exec_task)
exit_code = 0;
- else if (!thread_group_empty(current)) {
+ else {
struct sighand_struct *const sighand = current->sighand;
spin_lock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
--
2.35.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists