[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220622170627.19786-15-linmiaohe@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2022 01:06:25 +0800
From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: <shy828301@...il.com>, <willy@...radead.org>, <zokeefe@...gle.com>,
<linux-mm@...ck.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/16] mm/huge_memory: fix comment of page_deferred_list
The current comment is confusing because if global or memcg deferred list
in the second tail page is occupied by compound_head, why we still use
page[2].deferred_list here? I think it wants to say that Global or memcg
deferred list in the first tail page is occupied by compound_mapcount and
compound_pincount so we use the second tail page's deferred_list instead.
Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
---
include/linux/huge_mm.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/huge_mm.h b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
index 12b297f9951d..2e8062b3417a 100644
--- a/include/linux/huge_mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/huge_mm.h
@@ -294,8 +294,8 @@ static inline bool thp_migration_supported(void)
static inline struct list_head *page_deferred_list(struct page *page)
{
/*
- * Global or memcg deferred list in the second tail pages is
- * occupied by compound_head.
+ * Global or memcg deferred list in the first tail page is
+ * occupied by compound_mapcount and compound_pincount.
*/
return &page[2].deferred_list;
}
--
2.23.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists