[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20220622171946.mc3cd375fy4fou3b@maple.lan>
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2022 18:19:46 +0100
From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
To: Chen Zhongjin <chenzhongjin@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
live-patching@...r.kernel.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
ndesaulniers@...gle.com, mark.rutland@....com,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, broonie@...nel.org,
rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk, madvenka@...ux.microsoft.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/33] objtool: add base support for arm64
On Wed, Jun 22, 2022 at 11:48:47PM +0800, Chen Zhongjin wrote:
> This series enables objtool to start doing stack validation and orc
> generation on arm64 kernel builds.
>
> Based on Julien's previous work(1)(2), Now I have finished most of work
> for objtool enable on arm64. This series includes objtool part [1-13]
> and arm64 support part [14-33], the second part is to make objtool run
> correctly with no warning on arm64 so if necessary it can be taken apart
> as two series.
>
> ORC generation feature is implemented but not used because we don't have
> an unwinder_orc on arm64, now it only be used to check whether objtool
> has correct validation.
>
> This series depends on (https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/6/22/463)
> I moved some changes which work for all architectures to that series
> because this one becomes too big now.
> And it is rebased to tip/objtool/core branch.
What is the sha1 of the base?
With b4 and git am the patch series is derailing at patch 6 and I'm even
after a bit of fixup (had to use rediff) I'm still getting a cascade of
errors in later patches to decode.c .
Daniel.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists